To: verity
But he was impeached while he WAS a supreme, so the question of whether or not a precedent was ever set regarding the impeachment of a sitting Supreme Court Judge is still yes.
55 posted on
03/02/2005 3:27:09 PM PST by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: bill1952
Do we have to get in a pissing contest because, like Clinton, you want to debate the meaning of "is?"
58 posted on
03/02/2005 3:31:23 PM PST by
verity
(The Liberal Media is America's Enemy)
To: bill1952
But he was impeached while he WAS a supreme, so the question of whether or not a precedent was ever set regarding the impeachment of a sitting Supreme Court Judge is still yes.Correction: He was not impeached. He was tried "merely" for impeachment. A big difference -- like the difference between a lightening bug and a lightening bolt.
82 posted on
03/02/2005 3:56:40 PM PST by
yankeedame
("Born with the gift of laughter and a sense that the world was mad.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson