I agree...and that's why it is important that we support those who are working on our behalf. Tom Feeney is a relative newcomer, but he has been on the frontline's since he's been there. I don't know if there's a Senate equivalent, yet...but this is something we should push for.
Feeney just said (on my radio station) that he has plenty of support in the House, but that he may not be able to get it passed the Judiciary Committee. Here's a snippet of the original Bill, which he just revised today (from more than just a "sense") since this latest decision:
H.Res. 568, Reaffirmation of American Independence Resolution.
"Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that judicial determinations regarding the meaning of U.S. laws should not be based on foreign judgments, laws, or pronouncements unless such foreign judgments, laws, or pronouncements are incorporated into the legislative history of laws passed by the House and Senate or otherwise inform an understanding of the original meaning of U.S. laws." More...
"Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that judicial determinations regarding the meaning of U.S. laws should not be based on foreign judgments, laws, or pronouncements unless such foreign judgments, laws, or pronouncements are incorporated into the legislative history of laws passed by the House and Senate or otherwise inform an understanding of the original meaning of U.S. laws." More
What is this about? Where is the More.............This cannot go forward, U S Laws are based on the US Constitution. we don't give a shit about foreign judgments, laws or pronouncements........... WAKE UP STUPIDOS, WE ONLY ADHERE TO THE US CONSTITUTION, YOUR STUPIDO FOREIGN SO CALLED LAWS DON'T COUNT, WE WILL NOT RECOGNISE THEM, YOU ARE OBSOLETE! THAT INCLUDES YOU SCOTUS GOOF BALLS THAT MIGHT BE LOOKING TO DESTROY THE US! WE KNOW WHO YOU ARE! IT WOULD BE GOOD FOR THE UNITED STATES IF YOU RETIRED, SOON. DON'T YOU LOVE YOUR COUNTRY?
H.Res. 568, Reaffirmation of American Independence Resolution.
"Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that judicial determinations regarding the meaning of U.S. laws should not be based on foreign judgments, laws, or pronouncements unless such foreign judgments, laws, or pronouncements are incorporated into the legislative history of laws passed by the House and Senate or otherwise inform an understanding of the original meaning of U.S. laws." More..