Dan Caplis & Craig Silverman, both trial attorneys and legal analysts for television stations across the country, will be joining you on your drive home each weekday from 3p-7p. No strangers to radio, the duo have been frequent fill-ins for the legendary Peter Boyles and have been hosting an evening show on 630am KHOW for the past six months.
bring back tar and feathering for this man
Go get him you cool Dudes!!
Let's start a movement with the mantra
" Ward Churchill is a GIRLY MAN !"
Ward Churchill is no Indian... he's a scrotum pole.
Grab him by the nose and kick him in the ass!
Opening grapgic of 7.2 megapixals? Lord have mercy on us poor dial-ups! At least please post a slow-load warning!
this tired old ass needs to be yanked from the pasture and shipped to the glue factory.
Ward Churchill should be jailed for treason!.........
The school has the right to fire him.
He filed a false application for employment to them. His resume was false and he has brought embarrassment to the school.
He can say he is going to sue, but Professors get fired when things like lying about being an Indian or other things come out in public, which makes the school look bad having liars teaching.
grade retribution.
How about posting the Prof's ad as well?
Is the CO Daily ad that appeared two days before this one, bearing 10% of the CU-Boulder professoriate's signatures, on-line anywhere? I'm a disgruntled alumnus(Classics, '02) and I'd like to see if I recognize anybody.
I received from CU today a response to my email:
My email :
To: Peter.Steinhauer@colorado.edu, Regent.Schauer@Colorado.edu, Jerryrutledge@adelphia.net, tommyjclay@aol.com, Regent.Hayes@Colorado.edu, Gail.Schwartz@colorado.edu, Regent.Bosley@colorado.edu, Regent.Carlisle@Colorado.edu, Carrigan@colorado.edu
From: chuck miller <chuck@comcast.net>
Subject: Churchill is a fraud; not with my tax dollars !
Cc:
Bcc:
X-Attachments: :Macintosh HD:159365:ICT [2005.pdf:
All:
My tax dollars are being wasted on this fraud !
Stop this !
Churchill is not a Native-American !
Stop this fraud with my tax dollars. >:-o
Read this article by Patti Jo King in the
http://www.indiancountry.com/content.cfm?id=1096410417
--
Chuck Miller
Denver Colorado
Their response :
X-Originating-IP: [128.138.129.220]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 08:40:42 -0700 (MST)
From: CU General Distribution List <collect@colorado.edu>
X-General: <668>
Subject: Response Concerning Professor Churchill
SUBJECT: Response Concerning Professor Churchill
FROM: Philip P. DiStefano, Interim Chancellor
SENDER: Pauline Hale, UCB Communications Executive Director
DATE: March 3, 2005
On behalf of the Board of Regents and President Hoffman, I want to
thank you for taking the time to comment on Professor Ward Churchill.
While the issue is difficult, we can only be served by having an open
and honest dialog as we move forward together.
Let me state unequivocally that Professor Churchill's views are his own
and do not represent the views of University of Colorado faculty,
staff, students, administration or Regents.
As you may suspect, we have received comments from concerned local and
national citizens expressing viewpoints that range from urging for his
dismissal from the CU-Boulder faculty and other disciplinary measures
to supporting his right to express his opinions.
At the Feb. 3 Board of Regents meeting, I announced a course of action
that provides due process. Over the next few weeks, I will oversee a
thorough examination of Professor Churchill's writings, speeches, tape
recordings and other works. The purpose of this internal review is to
determine whether Professor Churchill overstepped his bounds as a
faculty member, showing cause for dismissal as outlined in the Laws of
the Regents.
At the conclusion of this examination, I will determine whether to
issue a notice of intent to dismiss for cause, other action as
appropriate, or no action. If a notice to dismiss for cause or some
other action is issued then the subsequent process will be governed by
the Laws of the Regents.
Before such a decision can be made, the University must observe due
process as required by the U.S. Constitution and the Laws of the
Regents. The University is obligated to carefully balance the
protections afforded by the First Amendment, as well as follow very
specific University rules and processes for faculty discipline. Our
processes will guide our actions in the most thoughtful and equitable
manner.
I am hopeful that you will consider the actions already taken to deal
with this matter that strikes so deeply at both our national conscience
and the core tenets of any institution of higher education.
President Hoffman has stated, "The rights afforded those of us in the
academic community to pursue our scholarly work come with a heavy
responsibility to behave with integrity and professionalism and to meet
the highest ethical standards our disciplines demand.
These standards create the boundaries within which academic freedom
rests."
I encourage you to visit the CU-Boulder News Center Web site at
<http://www.colorado.edu/news/reports/churchill/> for additional
information and updates on this situation.
Again, we thank you for your interest in the University of Colorado and
for expressing your opinion.
Sincerely,
Philip P. DiStefano
Interim Chancellor
In His Forever Grip
chuck