Skip to comments.
Our Duty - Vanity
vanity
| 3 2 2005
| olde north church
Posted on 03/01/2005 8:37:47 PM PST by olde north church
A Klansman turned Senator accuses President Bush of using Hitlerian tactic. Not a head turns.
Republicans have comfortable control over the US Senate, yet they gently tip-toe like syncophants to the minority.
The Republican Senate Majority Leader backs down from fights regarding a cornerstone of President Bush's 2nd term policy goals and a fight for judges that could turn the course of history and mold the future of America for the foreseeable future and beyond.
There is a severe lack of leadership and unity in the U.S. Senate and the time has come to call the majority leader for what he is, weak and ineffectual. The time has come for a vote of no confidence and put a powerful leader in his stead. This is not the time to shirk from our duty to the future.
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 109th; filibusters; judges; socialsecurity; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
To: Safrguns; All
3. Is capable and willing to beat the democrat's at their own game.
If he were capable of beating the democrats at their own game, this thread wouldn't be going on right now. If they were as good as shutting them down as well as the dems shut the Republicans down when they were the minority party. If the Majority were effective as they should be, we the dem leadership would be on every milk carton in the country.
41
posted on
03/01/2005 9:59:21 PM PST
by
olde north church
(Hasten, Brothers, on your way, exulting as a knight in victory.)
To: All
//sorry edit//
3. Is capable and willing to beat the democrat's at their own game. If he were capable of beating the democrats at their own game, this thread wouldn't be going on right now. If they were as good as shutting them down as well as the dems shut the Republicans down when they were the minority party, the dem leadership would be on every milk carton in the country.
42
posted on
03/01/2005 10:03:04 PM PST
by
olde north church
(Hasten, Brothers, on your way, exulting as a knight in victory.)
To: olde north church
Who said Frist was capable?
My point was that the replacement should be capable.
43
posted on
03/01/2005 10:07:05 PM PST
by
Safrguns
(It's Bush's Fault I owe $9.00 to FR!!!)
To: Safrguns
Sorry for the presumption.
44
posted on
03/01/2005 10:11:33 PM PST
by
olde north church
(Hasten, Brothers, on your way, exulting as a knight in victory.)
To: Cold Heat
I'm not sure the senate is so serene and quiet. It's more a case that Republicans have a way of gravitating towards the center, but not the Dems. The reason is probably because the Republicans are afraid of being marginalized by the Dems, as Clinton did to Gingrich in the 90's.
But the Republicans haven't had a dynamic senate leader in ages either. Why can't we have our Kennedy,Biden, or Boxer? I'm not sure of the answer, but it might be because we still have too many RINO's like Hagel, McCain,Chaffee, and some of the women.
45
posted on
03/01/2005 10:13:24 PM PST
by
Zivasmate
(" A wise man's heart inclines him to his right, but a fool's heart to his left." - Ecclesiastes 10)
To: Zivasmate
but it might be because we still have too many RINO's like Hagel, McCain,Chaffee, and some of the women.
Who do you think got Frist where he is?
46
posted on
03/01/2005 10:15:50 PM PST
by
Safrguns
(It's Bush's Fault I owe $9.00 to FR!!!)
To: Safrguns
Who would you suggest as the new majority leader?
47
posted on
03/01/2005 10:21:58 PM PST
by
Zivasmate
(" A wise man's heart inclines him to his right, but a fool's heart to his left." - Ecclesiastes 10)
To: Zivasmate
Well sure, but my point addressed that.
To expound, the democrats have gone were no caucus has gone before.
individual Senators have hashed things out on the floor, but they never did so as a caucus and aggressively fought judicial nominees before they got to the floor, for example.
This is pure partisan politics that here to fore was the mantra of the House and not the Senate.
On the surface, it looks like the Republicans just don't know how to handle majority status. But it is not the case. The Dems have done something that may forever change things in the Senate. A couple Dems and the Repub leadership are trying to get it back to normal, but they may well fail.
If that happens, you will see the Nuke option, and much more. There is still time for the Dems to come to their senses. We shall see.
48
posted on
03/01/2005 10:25:26 PM PST
by
Cold Heat
(FR is still a good place to get the news and slap around an idiot from time to time.)
To: Zivasmate
Who would you suggest as the new majority leader? Typical repub eat their own sydrome.
The Senate republican caucus, as it stands now can only be managed by someone like Frist, or other moderate.
The Dems know this, and are trying to split the caucus.
If that happens, then majority status will not mean a hell of a lot. it will be worse than a 50/50 split.
The caucus must remain together, they cannot spare but a couple of votes.
The Dems can be split as well, but the repubs have to deal to get that done.
It is gonna be fun to watch.
49
posted on
03/01/2005 10:34:28 PM PST
by
Cold Heat
(FR is still a good place to get the news and slap around an idiot from time to time.)
To: Cold Heat; All
Think of the exposure the Dems are getting in the media as well. Byron Dorgan doing hearings? Ted Kennedy's speeches getting covered? John Effin' Kerry's opinions on policy? Any doubt who's corner the media is in?
50
posted on
03/01/2005 10:50:51 PM PST
by
olde north church
(Hasten, Brothers, on your way, exulting as a knight in victory.)
To: olde north church
Any doubt who's corner the media is in?Nope!
They have been part of the progressive movement since Viet Nam.
51
posted on
03/01/2005 10:54:01 PM PST
by
Cold Heat
(FR is still a good place to get the news and slap around an idiot from time to time.)
To: Cold Heat; All
I refuse to fall into the trap of referring to liberals as "progressives". They are the most regressive bunch that ever walked the in the political parade of ideas.
52
posted on
03/01/2005 10:56:43 PM PST
by
olde north church
(Hasten, Brothers, on your way, exulting as a knight in victory.)
To: Zivasmate
Who would you suggest as the new majority leader?
I was agreeing with your statement. I have no idea who should be majority leader other than Frist. However, If we had to find a replacement, I would put all black republicans at the top of the list... Then I would rate them on pro-family values... then on leadership ability, and then on boldness.
Thats right... we need a black republican who will stand up for families, and is not afraid to slap a hairlip on the dems every time they say something stupid.
Hows that for wishful thinking? Too bad Watts quit. He'd be my choice.
|
|
53
posted on
03/01/2005 10:56:55 PM PST
by
Safrguns
(It's Bush's Fault I owe $9.00 to FR!!!)
To: olde north church
So you think replacing Frist will solve everything?
54
posted on
03/01/2005 10:58:05 PM PST
by
k2blader
(It is neither compassionate nor conservative to support the expansion of socialism.)
To: olde north church
Never the less, that is what they call themselves.
George Soros is the beef behind it currently, as well as the head of "Progressive Ins.", which is a bit humorous.
We need to demonize the name by using it. IMO.
55
posted on
03/01/2005 11:00:06 PM PST
by
Cold Heat
(FR is still a good place to get the news and slap around an idiot from time to time.)
To: k2blader; All
No man can serve two masters. Especially when one is the leader of the Majority Party and the other is the desire to be President. He is walking on eggshells, measuring every statement he makes as something that could be used against him when he runs in 2008.
56
posted on
03/01/2005 11:00:41 PM PST
by
olde north church
(Hasten, Brothers, on your way, exulting as a knight in victory.)
To: olde north church
I agree with you that Frist must go. But I think the problem is much deeper than that.
57
posted on
03/01/2005 11:02:04 PM PST
by
k2blader
(It is neither compassionate nor conservative to support the expansion of socialism.)
To: olde north church
I don't think that is the case. If he truly was running for office now, he would be further right.(run right, govern center)
He is trying to hold his caucus together. and perhaps bring a few Dems along.
If he comes out with guns blazing, he will be shooting blanks. That is the reality of it.
58
posted on
03/01/2005 11:05:07 PM PST
by
Cold Heat
(FR is still a good place to get the news and slap around an idiot from time to time.)
To: Cold Heat; All
I agree with you to a degree. There is a degree of passion that is lacking.
59
posted on
03/01/2005 11:10:12 PM PST
by
olde north church
(Hasten, Brothers, on your way, exulting as a knight in victory.)
To: olde north church
There is a degree of passion that is lacking. Yeah, perhaps there is. Not necessarily from Frist, but he should have his other leadership do that.
I think that is why they tried to damage Delay with such intensity. He had that role, and as far as I know, still does.
60
posted on
03/01/2005 11:14:32 PM PST
by
Cold Heat
(FR is still a good place to get the news and slap around an idiot from time to time.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson