Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thou shalt leave the monument on Capitol grounds
JWR ^ | 3-1-05 | Terry Eastland

Posted on 03/01/2005 10:40:43 AM PST by FlyLow

The Supreme Court will end its current term this summer with the state of Texas once again a party in one of the year's biggest cases. The case, which will be argued Wednesday, was brought against the state by Thomas Van Orden, the homeless attorney who lives in a tent in a wooded area in Austin. Mr. Van Orden objects to the Ten Commandments monument located on the grounds of the Capitol. It is an unconstitutional establishment of religion, he says, and he wants it removed.

Mr. Van Orden lost in federal district court and then in the 5th Circuit. Last fall, he asked the Supreme Court to hear his case. Ordinarily, a winning party opposes review by a higher court. But not this time. The state told the court that it should take Van Orden vs. Perry.

One reason the state took that position is that it could not credibly do otherwise: In 2003, the state filed as a friend of the court urging the court to address the constitutionality of a Ten Commandments monument in a case from another circuit. The state cited "the pronounced split" over the issue among courts of appeals, but the court declined to take the case.

(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: churchandstate; tencommandments; texascapitol

1 posted on 03/01/2005 10:40:43 AM PST by FlyLow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FlyLow
Let me see if I have this right.

A homeless person can live on public land, but the Ten Commandments may not be posted on public land?

2 posted on 03/01/2005 10:47:07 AM PST by OldFriend (America's glory is not dominion, but liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Of course. The liberals are living contradictions and they are going to continue to act that way. As long as they eradicate Christianity, they don't care.

It's just a matter of time before the ACLU gets involved.


3 posted on 03/01/2005 10:51:17 AM PST by wk4bush2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

>>>A homeless person can live on public land, but the Ten Commandments may not be posted on public land?<<

Ten Commandments to the back of the bus please and take Christmas with you.


4 posted on 03/01/2005 10:55:31 AM PST by rockabyebaby (What goes around, comes around!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FlyLow; maeng; ValerieUSA; txflake; WinOne4TheGipper; DrewsDad; HiJinx; Gracey; anymouse; ...

Austin Texas Idiot homeless attorney ping....


5 posted on 03/01/2005 11:00:30 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 ("I hate the Republicans and everything they stand for," - Howard Dean 01/29/2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP

Left you off the previous ping


6 posted on 03/01/2005 11:01:07 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 ("I hate the Republicans and everything they stand for," - Howard Dean 01/29/2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

"A homeless person can live on public land..."



I so agree with you!

Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. - This is such a totally Christian notion being practiced by the government. This man's very presence on public land is a living embodiment of Christianity. I think someone should bring a lawsuit to have him evicted.


7 posted on 03/01/2005 11:09:20 AM PST by Socratic (Ignorant and free? It's not to be. - T. Jefferson (paraphrase))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FlyLow

"end its current term this summer"

Did the Supreme Court relocate to south of the equator?

It is not summer here.


8 posted on 03/01/2005 11:14:32 AM PST by unlearner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlyLow

The Supreme Court has been dodging this one. I would have preferred to wait until after Bush has made a few appointments, or we're likely to get yet another 5-4 abomination that needs to be reversed.


9 posted on 03/01/2005 11:39:25 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952; FlyLow
Thank you, sir!


10 posted on 03/01/2005 12:38:08 PM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson