[Harmless Teddy Bear]

You seem to feel that they are less of a danger if they committed a heinous murder when they were 17 years and 364 days then if they committed a heinous murder when they were 18 years and 0 days.

I just gave you an opportunity to put your money where your mouth is.

That is not a personal attack but a logical continuation of what you said. Don't blame me if you don't like the result.

[colorcountry]

You seem to feel that they are less of a danger if they committed a heinous murder when they were 17 years and 364 days then if they committed a heinous murder when they were 18 years and 0 days

Okay you draw the line....Where is it? 14 years old and 364 days or 16 year old...Go ahead draw a line.

[Halls]

less danger? No, that is not what I think. I think they are a child under 18 and should never see the light of day again. But to put them to death I just don't feel comfortable with. I don't make the law though, and apparently the supreme court just decided, whether anyone agrees or disagrees.

And I'm not blaming you for any results, I'm asking you to back off of me, I just gave my opinion and you got snotty with me for no reason. Grow up!