Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Va. Terror Suspect Must Show He's No Danger to Make Bail [WaPoo very unhappy]
The Washington Post ^ | March 1, 2005 | By Jerry Markon, Washington Post Staff Writer

Posted on 03/01/2005 5:07:32 AM PST by aculeus

It is a premise as old as the American legal system: The government has the burden of proof in criminal cases, and the accused is not required to say a word in his defense.

But when an American student charged in an al Qaeda plot to kill President Bush appears in court today seeking his release on bail, it is Ahmed Omar Abu Ali who will have to show that he is not a danger to his Northern Virginia community

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; US: Virginia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: abuali; jihadinamerica; terrortrials

1 posted on 03/01/2005 5:07:32 AM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aculeus

"But when an American student charged in an al Qaeda plot to kill President Bush appears in court today seeking his release on bail, it is Ahmed Omar Abu Ali who will have to show that he is not a danger to his Northern Virginia community"

Ummm. seems like the standard ought to pertain to what he is charged with, not some peripheral red herring, as this implies.


2 posted on 03/01/2005 5:11:46 AM PST by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

The fact that someone was tortured does not mean that person is innocent.


3 posted on 03/01/2005 5:13:15 AM PST by jocon307 (Vote George Washington for the #1 spot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
The frightening thing is that his parents are probably very proud of him. These Islamic terrorists and would-be assassins see themselves as heroes and martyrs who will be the role models for all children in 100 years or so when the whole world has submitted. Our founding fathers were viewed as traitors by the British government and by most Brits, yet they personally did not view themselves as such. I think these vicious creatures see themselves in the same light light as freedom fighters see themselves (except that instead of fighting for freedom, they fight for submission).

We cannot shame these creatures into giving up. We will not convince the radicals of the errors of their ways. They are counting on future glory. We can only fight them and kill them until enough of them realize that we will not submit.

4 posted on 03/01/2005 5:39:22 AM PST by Montfort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

(banging of gavel) Point of order -- it's not a "fact" that he was tortured!


5 posted on 03/01/2005 6:44:22 AM PST by jiggyboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy

"...it's not a "fact" that he was tortured!"

That's correct, I was just trying to be concise. Even IF he had been tortured that wouldn't indicate innocence, nor would it constitute "sufficient" punishment.


6 posted on 03/01/2005 9:00:21 AM PST by jocon307 (Vote George Washington for the #1 spot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Montfort

It sounds like this whole family is a bad deal for America. They should probably all be deported.


7 posted on 03/01/2005 11:47:51 AM PST by Shazolene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson