Posted on 03/01/2005 4:21:10 AM PST by johnny7
Edited on 03/01/2005 8:28:14 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
I
(Excerpt) Read more at chron.com ...
I remember the 'wild' days of an Arkansas Governor... accused of rape. He eventually made it to the White House, fondled his staff and then 'finished' himself off in the sink.
My guess is that he's totally approving of Arnold stating he doesn't regret using steroids.
Pray for W and Our Troops
Well Clarence. If silence about drug use isn't helpful.
Tell us about what drugs you've used.
Better yet tell us about what drugs you are using.
How else can thoughtful reasonable young adults and
children know what to avoid.
I'm wondering whether Clarence Page - or any member of his family or any close friends - have ever smoked marijauna or done harder drugs. If so I think a full accounting is due by Mr. Page. All newspaper columnists are responsible for a certain public trust and should therefore disclose ever jot and tittle of their private lives.
I'm not the least bit disappointed, as Bush has told his story many times. I guess Page wants puff-by-puff and booze preference details. Perhaps Mr. Page would like to more openly discuss all of his past illicit sexual escapades - outside of marriage? As he says, it would be for the good of the children, right?
I'm sure we agree again that Clarence's only concern is for the children.
What is the point of this? Bush just won the last election he will ever run in. Shut up, sit in a corner and let Bush do his work.
Freedom is running rampant in the Middle East. The silent oppressed majority is getting a voice.
Three words, Clarence: blah blah blah
Republican presidential front-runner George W. Bush says he believes individual states should choose whether to ban the use of marijuana for medical purposes (Wash. Post, 1999)
Why stop there? Why not have all reporters disclose their sex lives? I mean afterall, we have recently learned from Gannon how critical it is to know all about reporters private lives.
Bingo.
I saw Arnold make that statement and what he said was that at the time it was done with medical supervision. I think he didn't "regret" doesn't mean exactly how it has been reported.
That said, Clarence Page is whipping a dead horse.
You're just pissed cause he didn't give you a good quote with which you can reduce him to the level of your fallen hero, WJC. Your bias is showing.
Clarence what?
What have we learned? We learned that Dem's hate homo's who aren't flaming liberal. They react the same way to conservative women, blacks and hispanic's... making them the biggest hypocrites on earth!
Bush's reputed "wild" days hardly make him unique among us, his fellow baby boomers and post-boomers.
Yes it does because he hasn't even had a drink since the early '90's. I (Feb., 1959) can't honestly say that he and I are fellow baby-boomers despite the demographic bracket...I certainly don't see this "fellowship" between a guy born in 1943 (GWB) and someone born in 1973 other than being your fellow man and American. President Bush wouldn't be called before a grand jury for hooey like that anyway so, what's the point? The expectation that trivial matters in the past life of the president can be back-driven to sworn testimony before a grand jury by the people is so much tabloidian delusions of grandeur. That kind of "Enquiring" mindset is literally pathetic.
It felt great when I cancelled my Fibune subscription and insisted on a refund. Page is a prime example of why.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.