Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWhale
This may also be related to why the strength of gravity is so much smaller than the other basic forces. All four should be roughly the same, but gravity is next to nothing by comparison. If most of the gravity is leaking, what we see is the small amount remaining in our universe.

Does the theory cover why it is only *gravity* that leaks?

Or is it that gravity is the only one of the four forces for which we can observe significant macroscopic effects on other massive bodies (i.e. galaxies) over astronomical distances?

I.e. strong and electroweak I wouldn't expect to notice affecting things however many gazillion light years away...

Full Disclosure: Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?

17 posted on 02/28/2005 7:58:31 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers
Does the theory cover why it is only *gravity* that leaks?

Not true! Depends leak.

21 posted on 02/28/2005 8:35:42 PM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

The idea, I think, is that gravity actually works over more than the three spatial dimensions. It is different from the other three forces somehow in that it is roughly inverse square. During the Big Bang at high temperature and pressure and very small dimensions, all four forces were one, but as things cooled there was a phase change and these different behaviors began.


34 posted on 03/01/2005 11:27:27 AM PST by RightWhale (Please correct if cosmic balance requires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson