Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Talk at the Oscars Is Over What Was Not Said
Rueters ^ | Feb 28th, 2005

Posted on 02/28/2005 3:51:30 PM PST by missyme

At the Oscar awards, what was not said was probably more interesting than what was.

Hollywood's big night on Sunday was beamed to the world with a five-second time delay, and broadcaster ABC ordered some controversial quips cut before the show, sparking debate about how far political correctness should go and freedom of speech controlled.

Comedian Robin Williams said it all when he walked on stage with a piece of white tape over his mouth.

Williams was to have performed a song lampooning conservative critic James C. Dobson, whose group had criticized cartoon character SpongeBob SquarePants for appearing in a video it branded "pro-homosexual."

He was going to do it by concentrating on the dark underside of other cartoon characters, asking, for example whether Casper the Friendly Ghost wore that white sheet as a member of the Ku Klux Klan.

Marc Shaiman, who wrote Williams' original routine, said he decided to withdraw the material after ABC raised objections that would have led to him re-writing 11 of 36 lines. ABC declined to comment.

"It's ironic because I feel the song is silly and the situation is silly and yet on the other hand it's extremely serious," Shaiman told Reuters from New York. "This is the most blatant, immature censorship that I've ever come across."

Williams did eventually develop an act questioning cartoon characters' sexuality. But it was a pale imitation of some of the lines originally planned and he looked pained performing it.

"The show lost what would have been the best minute-and-a-half they would have had last night," said Shaiman, before adding: "Where does the buck stop?"

Chris Rock, the edgy black comedian called in to host the show, and, some say, to boost flagging ratings, was also in trouble long before the Oscars got under way.

He previously joked that straight, black men did not watch the Oscars, drawing an angry response from commentators like Jake Lamar, an African American who called Rock's comments "a massive generalization" and "depressing."

Then Oscar producer Gil Cates weighed in, calling ABC's decision to introduce a time delay in transmitting from Kodak Theatre a "terrible idea" and a concession to political correctness.

IT BEGAN WITH A BARE BREAST

Federal regulators may boost fines for U.S. broadcasters following last year's infamous Super Bowl "wardrobe malfunction" by singer Janet Jackson in which she bared her breast.

Earlier this month the U.S. House of Representatives voted to raise the maximum indecency fine to as much as $500,000 from $32,500.

On the one hand, commentators predict that the more networks are forced to sanitize shows, the less people will be inclined to watch.

But at the same time, the more a show's producer warns viewers they may be offended, the more they are likely to tune in.

"The entertainment industry is figuring out how to spin and use this paranoia we've encountered since the Super Bowl," said Robert Thompson, director of the Center for the Study of Popular Television at Syracuse University.

"People wanted to make sure they were present if the next Janet Jackson moment happened."

In the end Rock's content was political and racial but avoided becoming the main issue on the night.

Thompson said Rock's natural instinct would have been to go much further with his humor, but he had too much to lose.

"He is going to play by the house rules," he said. "He realizes that certain compromises have to be made."

Williams was not available to comment on his act at the Oscars, but he told the New York Times on Friday:

"For a while you get mad, then you get over it. They're afraid of saying Olive Oyl is anorexic. It tells you about the state of humor. It's strange to think: How afraid are you?"


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: decency; fcc; oscars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: ReadyNow

FYI - Dobson is a Dr, but I don't think he is a Rev...

http://www.family.org/docstudy/aboutdrdobson.cfm


61 posted on 02/28/2005 4:43:45 PM PST by LearnsFromMistakes (We know the right things to do, why don't we just do them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: missyme
Oddly enough, one of the reasons cited for the thumbs-down on Williams' song (written by the "South Park" guy who writes the songs) was that it "made fun of Native Americans". Apparently, while making fun of every other cartoon, Pocahontas is off limits.

TS

62 posted on 02/28/2005 4:48:32 PM PST by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: durasell
Both movies cost $100 million to make and if you choose wrong, then you get to be fired and known as the guy who made the "Amish comedy."

There's the falicy. Most such little movies are actually very inexpensive to make. You can have several failures and limited markets, and still make money.

63 posted on 02/28/2005 4:49:26 PM PST by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: missyme
It's not enough for these folks to be wealthy (read "overpaid") and famous; they have to have the adulation of the masses at a special awards ceremony. Really! I refuse to participate.

Wow! Think I'm officially a curmudgeon and proud of it.

64 posted on 02/28/2005 4:51:43 PM PST by Calpublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narby

Not with actors who have international recognition getting $5 million plus. And the fact of the matter is, movies have an extremely low tolerance for failure. That's expecially true now during a boom time. If you want to fail, then you can go to television.


65 posted on 02/28/2005 4:53:23 PM PST by durasell (Friends are so alarming, My lover's never charming...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: missyme
Comedian Robin Williams said it all when he walked on stage with a piece of white tape over his mouth.

Okay, if I'd known that was going to happen, I might have watched.

66 posted on 02/28/2005 4:53:34 PM PST by Calpublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mears
People laughed themselves sick for years without any obscenities.

SO true. And in the presence and with the help of good, decent, fun friends, we still do. Just can't expect the arrested-development contingent of the MSM to deliver real wit.

67 posted on 02/28/2005 4:53:49 PM PST by DaughterofEve (W...AGAIN!!!! :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: silent_jonny
Rock didn't do what he was paid to do, which was to be a host. He insulted the Academy, movies in general, and several actors in particular. He was vulgar ("asses" "sucked"), mean, and abrasive. The show itself pandered shamelessly to Blacks (who is Beyonce and why did she sing THREE songs?!). The Bush-bashing was gratuitous, if predictable. This was the lowest I've ever seen the Oscars go, and that's the year counting Whoopi Goldberg hosted.
68 posted on 02/28/2005 4:54:00 PM PST by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: missyme
Chris Rock, the edgy black comedian

"Edgy....""Edgy....""Edgy....""Edgy....""Edgy....""Edgy....""Edgy....""Edgy....""Edgy...."

Did Hollywood give these lazy reporters talking points? Cliff notes? I am getting a bit sick of "edgy." Maybe we should mail Reuters, AP, and the New York Times a thesaurus.

69 posted on 02/28/2005 4:55:21 PM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter

I agree!


70 posted on 02/28/2005 4:55:31 PM PST by missyme (imho)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: utahagen
I agree.

(who is Beyonce and why did she sing THREE songs?!).

LOL--and who is P. Diddy and why did he present an Oscar?

71 posted on 02/28/2005 4:57:25 PM PST by silent_jonny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

" So it has gotten to the point that criticizing something is the same as trying to censor it, according to these so-called "tolerant" liberals?"

The libs have been doing this for years. Just like if you suggest that their policies harm America, they accuse you of "questioning their patriotism".

Dobson cannot censor anyone. He is not the government.


72 posted on 02/28/2005 4:59:16 PM PST by AZ_Cowboy ("Be ever vigilant, for you know not when the master is coming")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: missyme
The Talk at the Oscars Is Over What Was Not Said

Did you also notice who was Not There? Anybody recall seeing Jack Nicholson, Tom Hanks, Tom Cruise, Nicole Kidman, just to name a few?.... Guess they all knew it was gonna be a dud...

73 posted on 02/28/2005 5:01:03 PM PST by FDNYRHEROES (Make welfare as hard to get as a building permit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silent_jonny

I forgot about Puff Daddy. Even HE seemed confused about why he was up there.


74 posted on 02/28/2005 5:01:08 PM PST by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: silent_jonny
No no, I believe you. It was just completely uncanny timing that you posted the answer like 30 seconds before I posted the question.
75 posted on 02/28/2005 5:02:20 PM PST by Nate1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan
"Just looking at the guy depresses me; always has,"

Then do NOT rent the movie The World According to Garp. That will certainly put you right over the edge.

76 posted on 02/28/2005 5:05:17 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

"I don't identify with those people in any way, and I don't care what they're wearing."

LOL! Welcome to the age of maturity!


77 posted on 02/28/2005 5:05:32 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: missyme
How can a media enterprise censor its own content?
78 posted on 02/28/2005 5:05:38 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hi Heels; RonDog
Good to hear!
79 posted on 02/28/2005 5:07:16 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: missyme
If Robin want to take on Dobson; why not do it in another venue. . .like debate him. . .write an editdorial; why throw that out at Academy for 'entertainment', . .

. . .but why as why of these entertainers who imagine themselves accomplished, moral/political analysts. . .

80 posted on 02/28/2005 5:07:54 PM PST by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson