It would be difficult. This is what the parents are apparently trying to do. There really is no provision for a "friend of the court" situation in the context of dissolution of marriage, and really, at the trial court level at all!
Poohbah is right because the person's guardian is the proper person to represent her interests in the divorce but unfortunately this guardian would rather kill her than divorce her.
Sorry Pooh, mentioned you in an earlier post and forgot to ping ya! Manners matter! ;-)
And the parents have filed a petition in 2002 to remove Michael as guardian, but the Lord High Almighty Judge Greer won't let it move forward.
Worse, when the parents filed a different motion challenging Michael's authority to act as guardian pending the hearing, Judge Greer ruled that such a motion could only be brought by those with no other remedy at law. Since the parents filed a guardianship challenge, that was obviously a remedy at law that was available to them, and thus there was no need to allow them to challenge guardianship.
Greer seems to think he is Terri's court-appointed guardian ad-litem. Couldn't he petition the court (himself petition himself) to grant Terri a divorce? I know that doesn't sound right, but he's gotten away with acting as her GAL so far.