Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

More evidence of the insanity that runs the Democrat party.
1 posted on 02/28/2005 12:55:11 PM PST by RBroadfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: RBroadfoot

"Howard Dean, The 2005 Tour, sponsored by Pfizer"


2 posted on 02/28/2005 12:57:19 PM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RBroadfoot

Who will visit Lawrence next to speak of tolerance? Quantrill?


3 posted on 02/28/2005 12:57:28 PM PST by Publius (The people of a democracy choose the government they want, and they ought to get it good and hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RBroadfoot

Death to the intolerant right-wingers!!!!!-Howard Dean


4 posted on 02/28/2005 12:57:53 PM PST by henkster (When democrats talk of "the rich," they are referring to anyone with a private sector job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RBroadfoot

While Bush's leadership is changing the world, Dean bitches about inside baseball crap no one cares about.


5 posted on 02/28/2005 1:00:28 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Condi Rice: Yeaaahhh, baybee! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1350654/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RBroadfoot
Also here.
6 posted on 02/28/2005 1:02:02 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RBroadfoot

7 posted on 02/28/2005 1:03:33 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RBroadfoot
"Moderate Republicans can't stand these people (conservatives), because they're intolerant. They don't think tolerance is a virtue," Dean said, adding: "I'm not going to have these right-wingers throw away our right to be tolerant, which is why we should burn these MFers at the stake. Now there's tolerance for you." /sarcastically finishing the thought for Mean Dean.
8 posted on 02/28/2005 1:05:09 PM PST by WinOne4TheGipper (Post may contain hidden material.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RBroadfoot

I love it when the Dims pretend to speak for the American People, and now with Dean, they want to pretend to now speak for the Moderate Republicans.

How utterly clueless they are as to how arrogant they appear.


9 posted on 02/28/2005 1:05:41 PM PST by RightResponse (What if the Left, just got up and .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RBroadfoot

And the left wing has tolerance for who, other than themselves?


10 posted on 02/28/2005 1:05:55 PM PST by Supernatural (All the truth in the world adds up to one big lie! bob dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RBroadfoot; sure_fine

Howard "The Coward" Deanie-weenie = Mentally-ill.


11 posted on 02/28/2005 1:07:47 PM PST by 7.62 x 51mm (• Veni • Vidi • Vino • Visa • "I came, I saw, I drank wine, I shopped")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RBroadfoot

Good grief, he's still at it. How pathetic.


12 posted on 02/28/2005 1:07:47 PM PST by OldFriend (America's glory is not dominion, but liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RBroadfoot

SO did Doctor Dean perform abortions or not?


13 posted on 02/28/2005 1:08:32 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RBroadfoot

You gotta love this guy. The Dems are brain dead.


14 posted on 02/28/2005 1:10:19 PM PST by Huck (I only type LOL when I'm really LOL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RBroadfoot

I guess this means that we need to worry about losing Kansas?


15 posted on 02/28/2005 1:11:01 PM PST by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RBroadfoot

I think it's time to retire the battle between the liberals and the conservatives and think about the schism more productively and helpfully as the movement of the wholists as opposed by the fragmentalists. The former thinks of society as a united, integral whole while the fragmentalists are trying to divide society into as many different categories and special interest designations as possible, of which they can be the experts and spokespersons. That is essentially what the fragmentalists have to do to justify and sustain themselves -- produce that division, and the resulting conflict from that division. So they must always produce conflict as their reason for being.

Life without the conflict is unthinkable to them. Unless they can produce that division, how else can they distinguish themselves as the elite that should be leading, thinking and acting for the masses -- and being entitled to privileged status and high-paying jobs in a truly egalitarian society. So what is distinctive about all they do is proving how much smarter and deserving they are over everybody else -- and they don't see why others are so stupid they cannot recognize their obvious superiority, especially the president and those that egregiously mistake them for the busboy rather than the governor.

So extant liberals are invariably these people obsessed with their status vis-a-vis everybody else. Their essays and speech are invariably about how much smarter they are than everybody else -- and particularly the president. Because of affirmative action status or some other imagined or fabricated defect, they are entitled to lie, cheat and steal to get ahead, and not just to get even. Getting even is for the masses -- which assuredly, they don't intend to be.

In a previous day and age, they would have been kings and queens; now they are just our liberals. Isn't that obvious?

So what does this have to do with the old conservatives versus the new conservatives?

That's just it: trying to introduce another division and conflict in the integral whole. That's what the liberals/demagogues do -- create a division they can exploit. But we've been smart enough not to fall for their bait. That is a testimony to the much great sophistication in the public -- which the media doesn't want us to know about.

They would prefer that we believe there is no intelligent life "out there," but they, the media is the height of intelligence in the world because that is all we are allowed to see. But because of the Internet and direct meetings with people, we know that what the muck-a-mucks on high tell us is true may not be the whole story -- only what they would like us to think.

And then some liberal will chime, "How can you all be so suspicious about the media and journalists -- after all, they're practically working for free, as a self-less public service, with no designs of being the next media god at CBS. Honestly."


17 posted on 02/28/2005 1:14:44 PM PST by MikeHu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RBroadfoot
Dean said, adding: "I'm not going to have these right-wingers throw away our right to be tolerant."

To quote the Day After

This Lawrence ... Lawrence Kansas .... is anybody there??

20 posted on 02/28/2005 1:24:09 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Nations do not survive by setting examples for others. Nations survive by making examples of others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RBroadfoot
I'm not going to have these right-wingers throw away our right to be tolerant."

WTF?

21 posted on 02/28/2005 1:25:52 PM PST by JohnnyZ ("Thought I was having trouble with my adding. It's all right now." - Clint Eastwood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RBroadfoot
"This is a struggle of good and evil. And we're the good."

If you have to claim that your good,you are not.

29 posted on 02/28/2005 1:51:25 PM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RBroadfoot
does anyone besides me see a huge contradiction in the following phrase : "Moderate Republicans can't stand these people (conservatives), because they're intolerant . . ."?

someone seriously doesn't get it.

32 posted on 02/28/2005 2:28:43 PM PST by smonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RBroadfoot

"throw away our right to be tolerant"

HUH ..?? Does anybody know how us right-wingers are supposed to be doing this ..?? The logic totally escapes me.


34 posted on 02/28/2005 3:32:04 PM PST by CyberAnt (Pres. Bush: "Self-government relies, in the end, on the governing of the self.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson