To: Canadian Outrage
"IF it happens to Terri Lovegirl, it will KICK WIDE OPEN the Euthanasia door. Nobody in the USA will be safe, if sick or vulnerable in some way. I can see the politics behind this thing and it's wicked, very wicked. A way to save Medicare perhaps???"
It would keep it solvent a few more years, and Social Security, too. Have you noticed that neither party wants to touch this, and the few party members who do, fight an uphill battle? And they're somewhat shunned? That means that someone, somewhere, thinks that the deal is done and the fix is in. A pitch will be made to Generations X, Y and Z that their money is being "stolen" to pay for those useless eaters. They will probably buy it.
Who else besides SS/Medicare stands to gain? Medical insurance companies - less money paid out. Hospitals - fewer expensive treatments means a higher bottom line. Businesses - no more lengthy pensions.
Too angry to write more right now.
To: Wampus SC
EXACTLY!
SOROS is up to his eyeballs in this too!
He is ONE SICK FELLOW!!
"We should consider laws that permit next of kin to decide to forego life sustaining medical interventions even when a patients wishes are not known."
George Soros
3,042 posted on
03/07/2005 8:03:35 PM PST by
eeevil conservative
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for a good man to do nothing. Edmund Burke)
To: Wampus SC; All
I was noticing a lot of threads/info/people talking
about SS/Medicare and how sickos might think that this is
a warped way to cure the ills of it/them, and the the
"SS" took on a whole new meaning.
To: Wampus SC
Truly terrible Wampus. But your theory sounds plausible.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson