[Pegita]

Regarding "lack of bedsores," wasn't there an incident within this past year where Terri had developed bedsores and the complaint was investigated? The result was that Terri was given the most up-to-date mattress available. Anyone recall?

[ContraryMary]

The "lack of bedsores" comment was made by the Guardian Ad Litem in 2003.

[Pegita]

Ping to Post #2407

[nicmarlo]

I don't remember reading anything about that, pegita; hopefully someone else will and you'll get some info.

[cyn]

"Regarding "lack of bedsores," wasn't there an incident within this past year where Terri had developed bedsores and the complaint was investigated? The result was that Terri was given the most up-to-date mattress available. Anyone recall?"

YES there was. I'm just getting in, and only doing quick check in, but YES. It was of great concern -- coming just around the time that the Schindlers were barred from seeing her and the time she had her 5 teeth extracted.

Furthermore, I know that DCF received (many, they said) complaints in Oct '03 beyond that she was being starved/dehydrated.

Your question was prompted by pc93's post # 2398:

From another:

Wolfson was just on television (Channel 28) building up Greer,that DCF never had any complaint until now, saying that Terri never had a bedsore and that he visted with Terri for a full month.

Ch 28 said I am the only one who has called. 813-354-2800

pc, would you please clarify when that statement was made, source/link it if you can easily -- I tried to go up the chain of posts, but couldn't find it -- thanks.

[ruoflaw]

I remember something about that...maybe in 2004? I thought it was the newest high tech bed that would change her positions

[Ohioan from Florida]

Yes, Terri developed an decubitous (?) ulcer resulting from a bedsore. I probably can get hold of that info. I'll get back to you in a minute.

[Ohioan from Florida]

This is the best I could find about the ulcer from the bedsore so far. It was in the time frame of when the Schindlers were barred from seeing her last spring. I keep thinking that it was noticed sometime in February, 2004, but I can't pinpoint it (I also can't find the February daily thread, was there one?)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1120621/posts?page=51#51

To: floriduh voter; CindyDawg; fiesti; KDubRN
"JUDGE BAIRD said that he would review the proceedings and put something in writing... The Orders usually come down by fax to the parties."
...is this where what Pat Anderson calls "the rule of Terri's case" comes into play (as Wesley Smith wrote on 1/30/04)? Judge gives every appearance of fairly considering all points (heLLO, MS is a compromised guardian!), but then comes back with an outrageous ruling out of the blue?

What concerns me is that we do not know how Terri is. Those trumped up marks w/immediate blame placed on Terri's parents were for just this purpose: to keep scrutiny off Terri, exhibit A if you will.

Tonight, Terri is still missing (at least) 2 (TWO) teeth and has a decubitus ulcer of unknown severity. Those teeth didn't just walk out of her mouth, and the same neglect that allowed the ulcer to form (did her parents say how severe it was; did they see it?), if not remedied, will allow it to continue to progress -- healing it takes diligent effort! Infection can result from either site, and we know that MS did not allow treatment in past infections.

Anyways . . . I'm concerned for Terri. She and all fighting for her remain in my thoughts and prayers.

Oh, God, may your angels seen and unseen continue to guard, protect, and defend Terri from all evil near and far. Please keep anyone from hurting her -- in any way, in her body, her case, her family. This I pray in Jesus' Name, Amen.


51 posted on 04/19/2004 9:37:06 PM EDT by cyn (http://www.terrisfight.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]