Yes, they totally ignore Michael's inconsistencies.
Remember, he told the court in his lawsuit against the doctor/hospital that he would use all monies awarded in order to rehabilitate and care for Terri. He never mentioned she had said she didn't want to live "like that", whatever "that" meant. Later on, suddently he remembers that she would want to die.
As to why insert the tube, the alternative was to let her possibly choke to death or asphyxiate if eaten food were to block her air passages, which possibly could have happened in a difficult case like hers. She was lying down or propped, not fully upright a lot of the time, and it was difficult to get a lot down her. Plus, the nurses had better things to do than spend all their time making sure she ate and drank enough and none of it harmed her.
You see, the place where she was kept would have been liable if she had died in that manner. So they would not have followed Michael's orders to let that happen to her, and Michael himself could have been criminally charged if he were responsible for letting her die that way.
The tube did everything necessary for the "convenience" of all involved, and Michael set about to get a process going that would ultimately remove the tube under judicial order. Kill her, yes, with the court's blessing, and supposedly under the law.
Can anyone say "The Third Reich"???
your 1450 is a great post!
In your post where you discuss Michael's inconsistencies, this part-
You see, the place where she was kept would have been liable if she had died in that manner. So they would not have followed Michael's orders to let that happen to her, and Michael himself could have been criminally charged if he were responsible for letting her die that way.
My Reply: I couldn't agree for certain on this. All the previous affidavits etc. I have read indicates that Michael was a real tyrant with nursing staff. Has anybody that you can recall ever disobeyed a health care order from Michael, unless it came from a Judge?