Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BobL; anymouse

I thought ya'll were arguing that these landowners weren't going to get fair compensation, and how unfair it was that a private company might profit off that land while the landholder wouldn't get any of that profit. So now that it turns out the landowners will have the option of sharing in the profit, you're bitching about it?

Nice try at playing both sides of the argument.


17 posted on 02/27/2005 10:15:03 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Diddle E. Squat

DS,

I'm saying that they are lying about paying land owners
"royalties" in order to trick them into going along with this boondoggle. If you believe that they will see a dime of this, then I've got a bridge over the Hudson River to sell you. :)

You so blindingly support this boondoggle that it leads a rational person to wonder if you have a vested interest in TTC going forward in it's current form? Most people find the more they learn about TTC, the more they don't like it.

If TTC was so great, why would they keep changing the sales pitch with transparently bogus claims of benefits to the people that they are selling it to?


19 posted on 02/27/2005 10:45:50 PM PST by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat

Yea - if the money is being taken from me, the driver.

Like I've said, I ain't a landowner, so I don't care about their bottom line. But I do care about my tolls being FURTHER diverted from the highway.


22 posted on 02/28/2005 4:25:13 AM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson