Skip to comments.
Are we fools led by liars? (THE EU CONSTITUTION EXPLAINED)
The Times ^
| February 28, 2005
| William Rees-Mogg
Posted on 02/27/2005 3:42:43 PM PST by MadIvan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: MadIvan
That's true but you cant prevent him from voicing support for it. Plus, the euro skeptics could get financial support from Conservative institutions and intellectual firepower as well.
To: sanchez810
Well we've already got some of that - Dick Morris is helping the UK Independence Party here. I am sure we will not be without friends come campaign time. Remember, if one country says "No", the entire house of cards comes crashing down.
Regards, Ivan
22
posted on
02/27/2005 4:13:38 PM PST
by
MadIvan
(One blog to bring them all...and in the Darkness bind them: http://www.theringwraith.com/)
To: MadIvan
What is the problem for which the European Union is the solution?
France and Germany trying to resuscitate the USSR? Short term indigestion - long term disintigration.
And then I read your Post #20 - "destined to collapse"
So what is your point?
sp
23
posted on
02/27/2005 4:16:08 PM PST
by
sodpoodle
(sparrows are underrated)
To: MadIvan
The Union shall work for sustainable development of Europe based on balanced economic growth and price stability, a highly competitive social market economy, aiming at full employment and social progress, and with a high level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment. It shall promote scientific and technological advance.
This is a marketing ploy, not a constitution.
When will the Eur-inals realize that the bureaucracy of the EU is building the new U.S.S.R.?
Holtz
JeffersonRepublic.com
To: MadIvan
I recall that a Eurocrat said it depended on which country it was (Watch out Britain).
To: MadIvan
This has gone far, far beyond what was intended as a trade union.
IMO, they will regret this very soon.
One would hope GB sees through this French attempt at regaining the power it has longed for.
26
posted on
02/27/2005 4:22:16 PM PST
by
Cold Heat
(FR is still a good place to get the news and slap around an idiot from time to time.)
To: JeffersonRepublic.com
My post:
"France and Germany trying to resuscitate the USSR? Short term indigestion - long term disintigration"
Your post:
"When will the Eur-inals realize that the bureaucracy of the EU is building the new U.S.S.R.?"
posts separated by 5 seconds - were we separated at birth??? LOL
27
posted on
02/27/2005 4:26:13 PM PST
by
sodpoodle
(sparrows are underrated)
To: MadIvan
It creates a state. Article 11: The constitution establishes the European Union. Article 15a: The constitution . . . shall have primacy over the law of the member states.
Why do I get the feeling that America is going to be helping the UK gain Independence in ten years?
28
posted on
02/27/2005 4:27:38 PM PST
by
Righty_McRight
("Rescue those being led away to death; hold back those staggering toward slaughter" Proverbs 24:11)
To: sodpoodle
To: Righty_McRight
That will be about the same time that Prince Charles assumes the monarchy.
Ahhhhhh the monarchy - that which separates the UK from the EU states. There is a joker in the deck.
Long live the King.
30
posted on
02/27/2005 4:31:25 PM PST
by
sodpoodle
(sparrows are underrated)
To: Righty_McRight
"European Union. Article 15a: The constitution . . . shall have primacy over the law of the member states."
Goodbye Spain. I wonder if they would be allowed to rejoin the U.S. in Iraq after signing this document?
Holtz
JeffersonRepublic.com
To: MadIvan
The strength of the American constitution is in its transparency and relevance.And they manage to screw up its interpretation anyway.
Imagine what the judiciary could do with something like the European Constitution.
32
posted on
02/27/2005 4:32:44 PM PST
by
Restorer
To: MadIvan
Sounds like your garden variety Dimocrat
33
posted on
02/27/2005 4:34:41 PM PST
by
clamper1797
(This Vietnam Vet ain't Fonda Kerry)
To: JeffersonRepublic.com
Goodbye Spain. I wonder if they would be allowed to rejoin the U.S. in Iraq after signing this document?
If everyone passed it they wouldn't be able to unless the EU as a whole decided it. I think that's how it would work. The member states will sorta lose control of their military since you can't do anything that goes against the will of the EU as a whole. France may of finally conquered the Brits.
34
posted on
02/27/2005 4:37:48 PM PST
by
Righty_McRight
("Rescue those being led away to death; hold back those staggering toward slaughter" Proverbs 24:11)
To: Brad Cloven
"a highly competitive social market economy"
How about - a highly competitive super market economy?
To: MadIvan
The British should follow the advice of Monty Python in the Holy Grail, and "Run away!, Run away!", when it comes to the European Union. It is the killer rabbit come to life, for it looks harmless enough at first glance but is really quite dangerous. The British are too intelligent to further become involved in this train wreck.
To: MadIvan
The Union shall work for sustainable development of Europe based on balanced economic growth and price stability, a highly competitive social market economy, aiming at full employment and social progress, and with a high level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment. It shall promote scientific and technological advance. That won't last long.
37
posted on
02/27/2005 4:44:59 PM PST
by
GVnana
(If I had a Buckhead moment would I know it?)
To: MadIvan
A lot of the complexity of the Constitutional Treaty is merely carried over from the two existing EU treaties.
To: sodpoodle
worried about the EU as a counter-weight to the USATry EU, China and maybe Russia in the mix. Then you really do have something to worry about. The world won't be a better place.
39
posted on
02/27/2005 4:47:13 PM PST
by
GVnana
(If I had a Buckhead moment would I know it?)
To: MadIvan
Good luck. I once followed a link from here (FR) that allowed the reading of the EU Constitutional draft. I forget what article is was near the end of the document, but it was essentially an 'all promises are null and void if, and when, we decide this is so' kind of clause. Not too comforting to know that whatever is said about human rights is solely conditional on the whims of the elite.
40
posted on
02/27/2005 4:49:23 PM PST
by
WorkingClassFilth
(Equally offending all people equally - pursuant to the directives of the CRA of 1964)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson