Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Know your rights
"No, you showed where FDR courts said that it could and did."

The "FDR court" did not stretch the Commerce Clause. It upheld various federal enactments as necessary and proper means to achieve the legitimate objective of regulating interstate commerce.

180 posted on 03/03/2005 8:42:04 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen

robertpaulsen wrote:

The "FDR court" did not stretch the Commerce Clause. It upheld various federal enactments as necessary and proper means to achieve the legitimate objective of regulating interstate commerce.






Good grief, now your defending the FDR agenda.

Do you have no shame sir?


182 posted on 03/03/2005 8:52:26 PM PST by P_A_I
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]

To: robertpaulsen
The "FDR court" did not stretch the Commerce Clause. It upheld various federal enactments [including regulation of intrastate commerce] as necessary and proper means to achieve the legitimate objective of regulating interstate commerce.

You sentences contradict each other, once the weasel-words "various federal enactments" are clearly defined.

186 posted on 03/04/2005 12:30:10 PM PST by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson