[P_A_I]

robertpaulsen wrote:

The "FDR court" did not stretch the Commerce Clause. It upheld various federal enactments as necessary and proper means to achieve the legitimate objective of regulating interstate commerce.

---

Good grief, now your defending the FDR agenda.

Do you have no shame sir?

[robertpaulsen]

"Good grief, now your defending the FDR agenda."

Defending? I call it explaining. But I do it for those who are interested in the truth.

You, on the other hand, may be quite content to rant and rave that FDR "expanded" and "twisted" the Commerce Clause to suit his agenda. This is what you've heard. This is what you believe. This is what you repeat.

Those who disagree with you -- well, you smugly quip, "They're 'defending the FDR agenda'".