Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Cheney?
TheWeeklyStandard ^ | From the March 7, 2005 issue | Fred Barnes

Posted on 02/27/2005 5:15:44 AM PST by kingattax

VICE PRESIDENT DICK CHENEY IS adamant about not running for president in 2008. Asked by host Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday if he might change his mind, Cheney answered with a firm no. "I've got my plans laid out," he said. "I'm going to serve this president for the next four years, and then I'm out of here. . . . In 2009, I'll be 68 years old. And I've still got a lot of rivers I'd like to fish and time I'd like to spend with my grandkids, and so this is my last tour. I don't plan to run for anything."

And that wasn't all. Cheney said a primary reason he has influence with Bush is that he has pledged not to run. His ability to serve the president, he said, "depends upon my ability not to have any agenda other than his agenda. I made it clear when I took the job that I had no aspirations to run for president myself, that I wanted to be part of the team. And it's worked very effectively." If he were running, he'd have to worry now "about what the precinct committeeman in Ottumwa, Iowa, is going to think about me in January of '08." Since that's not the case, Cheney said, he's free to "offer my advice based on what's best from the standpoint of the president and his program and what we're trying to achieve now."

(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2008election; barnes; vicepresidentcheney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
We are very fortunate to have a man like V-Pres Cheney serving the country.
1 posted on 02/27/2005 5:15:45 AM PST by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Yeah. Gonna have to change my tagline.

"God bless President Bush and Vice President Cheney!"


2 posted on 02/27/2005 5:19:07 AM PST by evets (God bless president George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

I think Fred Barnes glossed over the idea of Cheney stpping down due to health reasons, and Rice taking the VP spot. That would put her in a great position to run for president in '08.


3 posted on 02/27/2005 5:23:42 AM PST by nuconvert (No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
We are very fortunate to have a man like V-Pres Cheney serving the country.

Indeed we are.

In an odd way, and I think then-Governor Bush knew this, the thing that makes Cheney the best candidate is the fact that he doesn't want or need the job.

As much as I'd like to see him do it, his (pardon the pun) wouldn't be in it, and I think he's earned the right to fish with his grandkids and enjoy retirement.

I really like him.

4 posted on 02/27/2005 5:24:02 AM PST by Gurn (Islam is a cancer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
Can you imagine the consternation democrat party hacks as they fought tooth an nail against her confirmation?
5 posted on 02/27/2005 5:32:36 AM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

A Vice President with no ambition to be President is such a relief. What a man!


6 posted on 02/27/2005 5:33:03 AM PST by Tax-chick (Donate to FRIENDS OF SCOUTING and ruin a liberal's day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

And sitting in the catbird seat.


7 posted on 02/27/2005 5:34:09 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
He would make an excellent president. He would probably also be the one that would drive the lib/dems over the edge into outright violence and confrontation- resulting in the inevitable conflict where the dems get slapped down like a Greenpeacer at an oil traders building. Too bad he won't run.
8 posted on 02/27/2005 5:38:09 AM PST by zygoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
I don't believe Rice will run, and if she did she probably wouldn't win. Hillary will take the feminist vote, not Condi. Condi, from what I understand, is pro-abortion which puts a damper on a number of voters enthusiasm. The black vote would in no way be guaranteed because she would be hammered by every black leader in America. I do not think she would even be a good campaigner.

To continue the strong willed, straight forward foreign policies of Bush, his brother Jeb is the answer for 2008.

9 posted on 02/27/2005 5:38:47 AM PST by normy (Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
Except in the 20th century, the track record of Veeps becoming president isn't that hot: Ike (Nixon, 60); LBJ (Humphrey, 68); Nixon (Ford, re-elect 1976, but the first real plebiscite on Ford); Reagan (Bush won, 1988, but then lost); Clinton (Gore, 2000).

The last successful Veep to be re-elected on his own was Truman in 1948.

10 posted on 02/27/2005 5:41:01 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news (there is no c in Amtrak and no truth in MSM news))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
If he chooses to run I will support him.

If he chooses to spend the rest of his days "Fishun'" I will support him.

Personally, I'd choose "Fishun'" but I hope he does whatever makes him happy.

11 posted on 02/27/2005 5:41:01 AM PST by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
It would be out of character for Bush to leave the selection of his successor to chance or to the whims of presidential primaries.

Yes, it would be. Which is why I'm not too worried about the primaries. I have every reason to believe based on assessment of this President that he hasn't devoted years of his life to turning this Party into a majority to allow someone like McCain to split the party in two.

He'll have a preferred successors and some runner ups. They may or may not be publically acknowledged as such.

Cheney will not run. It's time people took him at his word.

Cheney will not step down. That reeks of cynical politics, and Bush is a loyal man that relies on his counsel. He's a good VP and will remain VP.

Condi may or may not be a successor but failure to hold political office will not be the deterrent conventional wisdom holds it to be. Condi will not run without the President's approval, and I doubt she'd be a choice if he views are not majority in common with the base.

It is entirely possible someone spoken of little now has the President's eye as a successor. We'll see.

12 posted on 02/27/2005 5:41:59 AM PST by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: normy; LS

I know the " track record of Veeps becoming president isn't that hot".
I just thought Barnes glossed-over the possibility.
I don't think she'd necessarily make a good president, though she'd probably make a fine VP.
I don't think she'd be "hammered by every black leader in America.", however. Look at the support she got from left-wing African-American groups during her confirmation hearings. I was surprised at that. I think many more would come out in support of Condi in order to have the first African-American woman President. It would certainly be interesting.
Hillary would take the feminist vote. And that's all.


13 posted on 02/27/2005 5:55:15 AM PST by nuconvert (No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

I agree there, and I do think Condi is on a "fast track" to run for president. How one gets around her lack of elected experience is a problem. I could have missed someone, but no president since 1800 except Ike and Grant (perhaps Hoover) ever held the presidency without having an elected office first. So Veep wouldn't necessarily help her in that regard.


14 posted on 02/27/2005 5:58:34 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker

I am surprised Sen John Cornyn's name has not been mentioned as a possible candidate in '08. Perhaps there are concerns that Texas would be dominating the presidential field. Another name I would propose is former Gov Jim Gilmore of VA. I love Sen George Allen, but if he chooses not to run then I think Gilmore is another Virginian who would make a great candidate.


15 posted on 02/27/2005 6:03:39 AM PST by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LS

No SecState has been elected President, or even made a good run for the job. That is because foreign policy is a minefield, and mistakes are inevitable, so she will have many serious wounds four years from now.


16 posted on 02/27/2005 6:07:49 AM PST by MLedeen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LS

"How one gets around her lack of elected experience is a problem."

Well, that is certainly the usual path and one, in this case, that the fifth column in the press will whine about over and over until Nov. 2, 2008. I'd wager that for a lot of folks back in the sticks, it'll come down to who has demonstrated sound American principles, practical knowledge and just use of power. There's always a passel of elected buffoons just waiting to dance and the electorate knows that. Who they can actually trust is another.


17 posted on 02/27/2005 6:08:52 AM PST by WorkingClassFilth (Equally offending all people equally - pursuant to the directives of the CRA of 1964)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MLedeen

Which is why, if they are serious about running her, I expect her to serve no more than a year or so in this job then be groomed for another.


18 posted on 02/27/2005 6:15:09 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth

I'm not saying it is an insurmountable obstacle, but it is more serious than many Freepers want to acknowledge. As a S0S, she only carries out the policies of another. She cannot establish herself as having any original ideas, and certainly no clear track record of HER policies on which to claim victory or explain failure. This is no small matter.


19 posted on 02/27/2005 6:16:53 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: normy
Condi, from what I understand, is pro-abortion

You say Condi is pro abortion ?, Where did you hear that?.

20 posted on 02/27/2005 6:18:42 AM PST by reloader (Shooting- The only sport endorsed by the Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson