Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DannyTN
Is this the new Evo strategy if you don't like the article start something like you did in post 36 & 33 and then try to get the thread banned by running to the moderators?

No, he has actually been using this one for quite a while.
96 posted on 02/26/2005 9:13:30 PM PST by microgood (Washington State: Ukraine without the poison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: microgood
No, he has actually been using this one for quite a while.

Oh look, another false accusation by a creationist. Why am I not surprised?

Let's add you to the list: Support this slur, or retract it. Where exactly do you fantasize that I have "used this strategy for quite a while" in order to get threads banned? Or at all, for that matter?

Sorry, kid, but I don't try to get threads banned at all. I'd rather shine the light of information on them and show the lurkers just how devoid of knowledge and integrity you folks are, so that people will know to "consider the source" and be less likely to swallow the propaganda next time they hear it.

Like for instance, let's consider just a *small* sampling of the ways in which creationists have spread misrepresentations (from a previous post of mine):

Summary of the ability of the two creationists (Hovind and Havoc) to present information they *know* is false, and to *fail* to retract when reminded of their falsehoods, is presented here, along with links to all appropriate documentation.

This sort of behavior, unfortunately, is *typical* of creationists. Here, want dozens of more examples of their distortions? A few more for the road? Another? Still more, perhaps? How about even more? Ooh, here are some good examples. And there's lots more where that came from, like this and this and this and lots more here and *tons* here and countless more here and yet more here, a goodie... Wait, there's more over here, etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., *ETC.*, etc., etc., etc., . How about 300 more creationist misrepresentations? Not enough, you say? Well then visit Creationist Lies and Blunders. Hey, what about Freeper metacognative's (he's a creationist) ability to accuse Daniel Dennett (evolutionary scientist) of wanting to put Christians into concentration camps for their beliefs, when Dennett was *actually* clearly writing about how RADICAL ISLAM may need to be contained? The ugly details here. Metacognative *still* shows no shame for his patently false accusation.

Tell me, microgood: Do you condone this behavior of creationists? Yes or no? Is lying for the "cause" of creationism acceptable to you?
122 posted on 02/26/2005 11:45:04 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson