Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tribune7; Alamo-Girl; marron; PatrickHenry
Microevolution looks at adaptations that concern the survival of the fittest, not the arrival of the fittest.

This has always represented an insurmountable stumbling block for me. Because I can't seem to get over it, Darwinist theory remains at the very least incomplete as a description of biological reality.

How did all them critturs get there in the first place, so that natural selection could find something to do?

And we haven't even touched the claims of macroevolution yet!

This really is a most penetrating article, Tribune7. Thanks so much for pinging me!

18 posted on 02/26/2005 6:17:44 PM PST by betty boop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: betty boop
This has always represented an insurmountable stumbling block for me. Because I can't seem to get over it,

The validity of a scientific theory is not limited to what you can "get over".

How did all them critturs get there in the first place, so that natural selection could find something to do?

The great majority of "all them critters" got here via evolution.

The initiators got here via autopoesis of chemical cycles in deep-sea thermal vents.

And we haven't even touched the claims of macroevolution yet!

No need, macroevolution is extremely well established.

44 posted on 02/26/2005 7:17:09 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson