1 posted on
02/26/2005 8:45:18 AM PST by
FreeManDC
To: FreeManDC
just because men disagree with the radical feminists, does not mean that men are against equality.
it means that men are against socialism.
2 posted on
02/26/2005 8:48:32 AM PST by
ken21
( warning: a blood bath when rehnquist, et al retire. >hang w dubya.< dems want 2 divide us.)
To: FreeManDC
This is a trick by the UN to impose abortion on the world. We should not support it.
To: FreeManDC
If Eleanor "pap" Smeal is fer it - I'm agin it.
4 posted on
02/26/2005 8:49:37 AM PST by
leadpenny
To: FreeManDC
the Beijing Platform for Action Are they referring to the ChiCom mandatory abortions to enforce the one-child policy or perhaps infanticide when the child born happens to be a girl?
5 posted on
02/26/2005 8:50:21 AM PST by
peyton randolph
(CAIR supports TROP terrorists)
To: FreeManDC
Yawn.
America actually liberates women. The UN talks about it.
6 posted on
02/26/2005 8:50:45 AM PST by
Dog Gone
To: FreeManDC
So what have we got here? The leftist view of womens rights or the Iraqis and Afghanis view? I vote we go with the Iraqis and Afghani's on this one.
BTW where are these so-called womens groups on Iraq and Afghanistan? I think you know the answers.
7 posted on
02/26/2005 8:51:13 AM PST by
Tarpon
(Hate is not a plan for America)
To: FreeManDC
8 posted on
02/26/2005 8:52:21 AM PST by
yeetch!
(Enjoy the good times!)
To: FreeManDC
YES!!!!!
Kofi annan tries to piss on the USA by trying to organize a global security force under UN control, tries to LIE and say the UN did the initial relief work for the Tsunami disaster. (if you watched the BBC you never even knew the USA was there, it was all UN cooooordinated.)
GW Bush MUST keep kicking the UN. They obviously have not learned their lesson.
To: FreeManDC
It was at the 1995 Beijing Women's Conference that women around the world took up the rallying cry: "women's rights are human rights." This statement is wrong. Human rights are human rights. Women possess those rights, but they have no right to anything more or anything less. The previous conference was just an opportunity for Hillary and her cohorts to sit around squawking about what they wish could be. We have no reason to support the furtherance of her demented wishes. If the president goes through with reducing support for that nonsense, he will have done a very good thing for this nation and this world. Applause to President Bush.
Bill
12 posted on
02/26/2005 8:56:44 AM PST by
WFTR
(Liberty isn't for cowards)
To: FreeManDC
These activist should try telling the Arab world how to treat their women.
Then they better run for their lives. ;-)
13 posted on
02/26/2005 8:57:34 AM PST by
cgbg
(Jodi, Stop Pooping In The Living Room!)
To: FreeManDC
Didn't Hitlery attend this as the U.S. Rep? Didn't she refuse to see some Chinese pro-democracy activists or something? Is this where she hugged Mrs. Yasser Arafat? I don't know why I seem to remember that . . . but even if she didn't, this is the kinda radical nonsense the Klintoons gave to us, along with Kyoto, the World Court, and other who-cares-about-American-sovereignty BS.
Supported by . . . Amnesty International; Center for Health and Gender Equity; Center for Women's Global Leadership; Feminist Majority; U.S. Committee for UNFPA; Women's Edge Coalition; Women's Environment and Development Organization; Blah, blah, blah.
As an aside . . . I don't profess to know squat about ALL the issues this pertains to but if these folks are for it, I suspect it ain't in our best interest.
14 posted on
02/26/2005 9:01:36 AM PST by
geedee
(You're a Patriot when a half-masted Old Glory makes you grieve, and Old Hillary makes you heave.)
To: FreeManDC
"The U.S. should reaffirm, not retreat from, women's rights and equality. Globally, this is about saving women's lives," said Eleanor Smeal, president of Feminist Majority. I am not sure the 100 million aborted girls would agree with that assessment.
To: FreeManDC
Is President Bush "turning his back" on a UN resolution... The same UN that's involved in the slave sex trade? That UN?
Mark
18 posted on
02/26/2005 9:40:31 AM PST by
MarkL
(That which does not kill me, has made the last mistake it will ever make!)
To: FreeManDC
The most recent U.S. statement of position, for example, asserts parental rights to make reproductive health decisions for adolescents, stresses U.S. support for abstinence-only sex education, and reserves the U.S. position on sexual rights.These are some of the areas where the U.S. position differs from the existing agreement.
19 posted on
02/26/2005 9:46:21 AM PST by
layman
(Card Carrying Infidel)
To: FreeManDC
"The U.S. should reaffirm, not retreat from, women's rights and equality. Globally, this is about saving women's lives," said Eleanor Smeal, president of Feminist Majority." err....retreat? What are you smoking you twit?
20 posted on
02/26/2005 10:13:30 AM PST by
Donald Rumsfeld Fan
("Memos on Bush Are Fake but Accurate". NYTimes)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson