Posted on 02/26/2005 5:48:50 AM PST by NCjim
On the day the Kyoto Protocol came into force - 11 days ago - Greenpeace protesters tried to paralyse oil trading by storming the International Petroleum Exchange in London.
But a sign that irresponsible green antics have outworn their welcome came in a hilariously po-faced article about the protest published in The Times in London.
"What [the 35 protesters] were not prepared for was the post-prandial aggression of oil traders who kicked and punched them back on to the pavement . . . Protesters conceded that mounting the operation after lunch may not have been the best plan."
While breaking the jaws of Greenpeace protesters is not to be recommended, the story does illustrate that the good-natured, hear-them-out tolerance most of the world has afforded green hysterics for the past 30 years may be running out. After all, the dissent-crushing intolerance of the green movement is legendary.
The Greenpeace protesters described the traders, most of whom were under the age of 25, as "just Cockney barrow boy spivs", which reveals more about the protesters than it does about the defenders of the trading floor.
Another sign green-mongering is wearing thin is the bestseller success of Michael Crichton's latest thriller State Of Fear, a novel in which the bad guys are extreme greens who plot to create artificial environmental catastrophes, like a tsunami, to bolster support for their crusade.
Crichton, author of bestsellers such as Jurassic Park and The Andromeda Strain, which have sold more than 100 million copies worldwide, has obvious popular appeal. But he is also a Harvard-trained medical doctor and he backs up the science in his book with a 21-page bibliography, a five-page appendix titled "Why politicised science is dangerous" and an "Author's Message" in which he states his position.
"Nobody knows how much of the present warming trend might be a natural phenomenon. Nobody knows how much of the present warming trend might be man-made. Nobody knows how much warming will occur in the next century," he writes.
"Scientists know that continued funding depends on delivering results the funders desire. As a result environmental organisation 'studies' are every bit as biased and suspect as industry 'studies'. No faction should be given a free pass."
All of which seems reasonable. But, of course, Crichton has been dismissed as just another ignorant extremist.
Danish statistician and former Greenpeace member Bjorn Lomborg copped a similar beating from the environmental establishment and its enablers in the media when he questioned the benefits of the Kyoto protocol in his bestseller The Skeptical Environmentalist. Lomborg concluded Kyoto would do little to reduce global warming, but would cost the global economy as much as $274 trillion by 2100.
What's more, he said the cost of one year's compliance with Kyoto "could give clean drinking water and sanitation to every human being on Earth".
The response was to liken him to a Holocaust denier and drag his reputation through the mud. The author of a book on climate change threw a cream pie in his face at a book-signing at Oxford.
Other dissenters have met similar fates. When Dr Fred Seitz, the past president of the US National Academy of Sciences, organised a petition opposing the Kyoto Protocol, he had 20,000 signatories - 17,000 with scientific degrees, including physicists, geo-physicists, climatologists, meteorologists, oceanographers and environmental scientists. But for simply stating there was no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases was causing catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of climate, they were dubbed "The Carbon Club, foot soldiers for the fossil-fuel industries".
Proof of just how free a pass has been given to the global warming doomsayers came in the recent demolition of a hitherto unquestioned mathematical cornerstone of their theory. The so-called "hockey stick graph" published in 1998 by University of Massachusetts geoscientist Michael Mann became an article of faith, and underpinned the Kyoto Protocol. It purported to plot average surface temperatures of the Northern Hemisphere for the previous 1000 years. Temperatures appear to remain constant until 100 years ago when the graph takes a sudden upturn, supposedly showing the Earth heating up as the industrial revolution kicks in.
It took six years and several sacked scientific journal editors before doubt was thrown on the hockey stick. Last year Canadian scientists Stephen McIntyre and Ross McKitrick discovered a fundamental flaw in the computer program which produces the hockey stick. It seemed, whatever random data it was fed, the program almost always produced a hockey stick.
The Canadians couldn't get their work published by a scientific journal but they put it on the web for all to see.
"That discovery hit me like a bombshell," wrote Richard Muller in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Technology Review. "Suddenly the hockey stick, the poster-child of the global warming community, turns out to be an artifact of poor mathematics." Eureka!
The voices of dissenters have been silenced for too long so all power to Crichton for bypassing the gatekeepers and going straight to the people. You can only suspect the pendulum of environmental thought might be swinging back towards the rational, collecting the odd Greenpeace jaw as it goes.
Yeah, not bad...first time I've read one.
With a name like that, she just HAS to be PC! Good article, and good on'ya Dr. Crighton.
Well it may not be 'recommended', but I'll bet it's loads of fun.
"Proof of just how free a pass has been given to the global warming doomsayers came in the recent demolition of a hitherto unquestioned mathematical cornerstone of their theory. The so-called "hockey stick graph" published in 1998 by University of Massachusetts geoscientist Michael Mann became an article of faith, and underpinned the Kyoto Protocol. It purported to plot average surface temperatures of the Northern Hemisphere for the previous 1000 years. Temperatures appear to remain constant until 100 years ago when the graph takes a sudden upturn, supposedly showing the Earth heating up as the industrial revolution kicks in. "
"It took six years and several sacked scientific journal editors before doubt was thrown on the hockey stick. Last year Canadian scientists Stephen McIntyre and Ross McKitrick discovered a fundamental flaw in the computer program which produces the hockey stick. It seemed, whatever random data it was fed, the program almost always produced a hockey stick."
"The Canadians couldn't get their work published by a scientific journal but they put it on the web for all to see."
"That discovery hit me like a bombshell," wrote Richard Muller in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Technology Review. "Suddenly the hockey stick, the poster-child of the global warming community, turns out to be an artifact of poor mathematics." Eureka!"
"The voices of dissenters have been silenced for too long so all power to Crichton for bypassing the gatekeepers and going straight to the people. You can only suspect the pendulum of environmental thought might be swinging back towards the rational, collecting the odd Greenpeace jaw as it goes."
If they had their attitude adjusted more often, maybe they would quit their protesting.
Ernest here is another club to pound the green Willies with.
Apparently, the watermelon's hockey stick math formula was "gamed" to show so called global warming.
Thanks for the post.
Whoa there. Let's not be too hasty in rejecting that option ...
....as opposed to panty wearing watermelons on the receiving end of a well deserved @$$ kicking.
No it is an article of pure and clever deceit. Any reputable scientist would have tested the program against known data or as in the case random data. It probably took a hell of a lot of work to produce the program that would give them the desired answer regardless of the data feed it.
"Everybody" says it, therefore it must be true. Never mind that there are no facts to back up "everybody"
And what, pray tell, was the path from there to the attention of a wider public? It wouldn't have been bloggers and FR and then talk radio, by any chance?
I wish the green Nazis would try to storm my workplace; the guards are authorized to use deadly force.
Probably the first step was posting the data on some site on the internet. Then your comments could probably be the path of this data. Your comments:
"And what, pray tell, was the path from there to the attention of a wider public? It wouldn't have been bloggers and FR and then talk radio, by any chance?"
Excellent article. Thanks for posting!
"The voices of dissenters have been silenced for too long so all power to Crichton for bypassing the gatekeepers and going straight to the people. You can only suspect the pendulum of environmental thought might be swinging back towards the rational, collecting the odd Greenpeace jaw as it goes."
Finally! And I really loved the imagery of floor traders beating the snot out of those dopes. Anyone that can work a stock exchange floor has got to be a quick thinker and able to handle anything that comes their way. It was probably like swatting flies for them, LOL!
The jaws of Greepeace communists should be broken often and at every opportunity.
Greenpeace is one of the lead communist organizations banning DDT. The mosquito borne illness that DDT could control affects 300 million people in the Third World and kills 2 to 3 million citizens, mostly women, children and babies. Greenpeace is engaged in mass murder, but the ICC will never charge them.
I place Greenpeace in the crowd that includes Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot.
Every time a jaw of a Greenpeace communist is broken is a cause for celebration. If it were up to me, the United States should declare Greenpeace members as terrorists to be shot on sight.
Wonder if there is a video of the event? I'd pay good money to see that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.