[vivabushchick]

Churchhill continues to be taken to the woodshed; by his peers no less.

[1FASTGLOCK45]

vivabushchick wrote:
Churchhill continues to be taken to the woodshed; by his peers no less.

--> I'm not familiar with this term "taken to the woodshed" in the context you used it. Could you give me an anology? Thanks :)

[msnimje]

Behind the painful rhetoric you use, I sense a nobler goal, the desire to tell the American people that we must be aware of ourselves in the world, take responsibility and work to understand and change the wrongs that have been committed. If this is your greater message, my brother Chris would have agreed with you whole-heartedly.

Churchill is too stupid to make this point and "noble goals" are not his motivation. He is a small minded ignorant nothing. His life is about ripping off other people's art, writing ,research, ideas, etc and then call others "dishonorable." I repeat, he is nothing

[nopardons]

bttt

[jocon307]

"If you cannot make your point [in a better] way, it is you who is "braying," playing the role of provocateur and not speaking from any coherent moral conviction."

But of course that is exactly what Churchill IS doing, and this lefty's sincere pleadings will fall on deaf ears. Plus Churchill is demented and delusional and would be better off in a mad house than a college campus.

[wingman1]

"... your grossly inappropriate characterization of Chris and the other 9/11 victims has been surpassed in vulgarity only by the misinformed advocates of aggression who used those beautiful innocents who perished on 9/11 as propaganda for immediate and misguided violence and destruction."

From what I can gather, the writer is saying that supporters of the war in Afghanistan - which is direct retribution against those responsible for his brother's death - and supporters of the general War on Terror are more vulgar and misguided than Churchill.

Thankfully we do not rely on these types (Churchill and the author), whom I categorize as one and the same, for our protection and security.

"You are either with us or or with the terrorists". Quite simple.

[Wilhelm Tell]

It is pathetic how liberals will try to "reason" with a lunatic. The author just doesn't get it that Churchill is glad the author's brother was killed and he wants thousands of others to die in future terrorist attacks. The author can't imagine that if Churchill reads his article, Churchill will dismiss it with a laugh and probably relish the fact that small children lost parents on 9/11. Rather than trying to reason with an evil man, a better effort would be to see to it that Ward Churchill is no longer an employee of the State of Colorado. Taxpayers should not be forced to subsidize Ward Churchill's hate propaganda.

[Guillermo]

Even the DUmmies are turning against him...

[jigsaw]

Churchill is simply another leftist who uses bluster and outrage because of his inability to use facts and logic.

It works because there are others who will support him because they can't use facts and logic themselves.

It is immaturity on parade.

[ken21]

i think churchill is a psychopath or sociopath same thing.

and empathy for others is beyond him.

[cynicom]

Author and Churchill could be Indian blood brothers.