Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clint Eastwood Made My Day
JWR ^ | 2-25-05 | Ruben Navarrette Jr.

Posted on 02/25/2005 10:15:56 AM PST by FlyLow

Clint Eastwood made my day. It happened during a recent interview with The New York Times in which the actor-director said he was baffled by the controversy surrounding his latest film, "Million Dollar Baby."

What Eastwood finds frustrating is that a movie that isn't really political has had to endure political fallout from right-wing talk show hosts who insist that the film — in a plot twist already revealed elsewhere — pushes liberalism by promoting assisted suicide.

Given that Eastwood is the former Republican mayor of Carmel, Calif., and a movie star who once played hard-nosed Police Inspector Harry Callahan, aka "Dirty Harry," the irony is palpable. But what caught my attention was what Eastwood had to say about the ruckus. He harkened back to an earlier time when politics were more cordial and the discussion of all things political wasn't so all-or-nothing.

"Maybe I'm getting to the age when I'm starting to be senile or nostalgic or both, but people are so angry now," Eastwood said. "You used to be able to disagree with people and still be friends. Now you hear these talk shows, and everyone who believes differently from you is a moron and an idiot — both on the right and the left." Bravo. Eastwood has just zeroed in on one of the biggest problems with political discourse in this country. It's a problem that needs fixing, and, until it gets fixed, the political process will not work as well as it would without all the acrimony and accusations.

(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: eastwood; milliondollarbaby
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: Bommer

Worthy point.


41 posted on 02/25/2005 11:56:16 AM PST by baseballfanjm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: FlyLow
Through Hollywood retirement, abortion, environment, single mothers, food labels, health were all made political. NOW Eastwood is complaining everything is political?

Schwartznegger has said they are going to where the evil is and they will fight the fight and this is the correct view to take.

Some people are willing to listen and these are the ones one can engage in conversation. Many are not.

Eastwood is a VERY VERY liberal Republican. Sometimes they are worse than liberals.

42 posted on 02/25/2005 11:57:47 AM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlyLow
I like Clint Eastwood quite a bit, and I know from his occasional appearances calling in to KSFO talk radio that he's much closer to our side than the left.

However, he's a multi-millionaire resident of a gorgeous and remote California coastal town where he used to be tallest hog at the trough.

There's nothing wrong with that of course, but it goes a long way to explain how Eastwood has the luxury of an 'Hey, what's all the fussing about?' attitude.

43 posted on 02/25/2005 12:15:19 PM PST by The KG9 Kid (Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up

I kind of agree with Clint on this too.....regardless of politics, the atmosphere seems alot more polluted than the last several years.........yes I do blame the Dems for the most part but even here you can see it on threads....like McCain threads.....he is obviously hated alot here, but when people call him a traitor or POS or whatever, well that doesn't add to the discussion and only heats up side issues......I can argue with the best of them but would rather discuss viewpoints without being a traitor, or RINO. or whatever.....those are just emotional outbursts, not reasoned thought........


44 posted on 02/25/2005 12:49:43 PM PST by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: NorCalRepub
When you realize what the Democrats tried to do, it is cause for some valid anger.

The Dems power is still not gone...there is still work to be done. However, it is wonderful to see how much they have crashed and burned. The anger will continue for some time. It's inevitable.

45 posted on 02/25/2005 12:54:53 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Hatteras

Every time I see Carville's face, I think of that Peter Griffin line:

"OH GOD!!! Did someone open the Ark of the Covenant!?"


46 posted on 02/25/2005 1:07:51 PM PST by mbennett203 ("Bulrog, a tough brute warrior who has dedicated his life to ridding the world of hippies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Maybe he should have stuck to spaghetti westerns.

Yeah,starring in them,not directing them.

47 posted on 02/25/2005 1:10:46 PM PST by kennyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tahiti
The present day political process is ultimately about money and power.

And this is different from the past how?

The Founding Fathers were keenly aware of this problem which is why they wrote the Constitution in such a way that it would "pit competing ambitions against each other". It is nothing new.

48 posted on 02/25/2005 1:19:48 PM PST by Zhangliqun (What are intellectuals for but to complexify the obvious?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: what's up
Eastwood is a VERY VERY liberal Republican. Sometimes they are worse than liberals.

He's not a Republican. He considers himself a libertarian.

49 posted on 02/25/2005 1:23:47 PM PST by Zhangliqun (What are intellectuals for but to complexify the obvious?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: FlyLow

The problem with Clint's take on it is that if American politics didn't have such a wide rift in it, America would basically become like Canada - a very scary premise. The left has gone whacko, as simple as that. Wait a minute, I meant to say the left has gotten even more whacko.


50 posted on 02/25/2005 1:34:45 PM PST by Ashamed Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bommer
Sorry but if you can't separate the actor for the activism, your asking for boxoffice death!

This is a good point, one I've been making for some time now. It's one thing if an actor appears on Leno (Carson) or Letterman or whoever, and says pretty calmly, hey this what I believe but it takes all kinds to make a world, blah-blah-blah, which is the way it used to be.

But when they go out of their way to so publicly and constantly heap insults on their audience in a screechy, sanctimonious tone, then it becomes extremely difficult for the audience to separate the actor from the insults he or she has hurled at you. In the public eye, they become annoying activists who make movies as a part time job.

If the Garafolo-ites think that's unfair, then they are even bigger wack-jobs than we thought. This is just Business 101. Never alienate your customers. Would these actoids go to a restaurant where they knew some of the waiters were people who insulted them when they saw them out on the street?

51 posted on 02/25/2005 1:39:28 PM PST by Zhangliqun (What are intellectuals for but to complexify the obvious?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Zhangliqun

All I know is he was the Republican mayor of Carmel.


52 posted on 02/25/2005 1:48:27 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: baseballfanjm; MeekOneGOP; Happy2BMe; PhilDragoo; potlatch; ntnychik; Smartass; Grampa Dave; ...


I saw "Mystic River" on my WebTV/DirecTV - PIP - while surfing FR the other day

Good actors, performances - a powerful movie - a few actors seem to have that nutcase off-screen Limo-Socialist-Lobbyist millionaire agenda which Eastwood does not seem to have

I have not seen this latest flick so I can not intelligently comment about it (many lib journalists never seem to need to even read the book, see the movie)

It is truly a shame that Sean Penn and Tim Robbins adopt an stupid "expert on national security" role instead of applying that emotion and passion to future acting roles.

Penn and Robbins were good in their roles but I kept thinking of their pro-Saddam Hussein statements, and in Sean Penn's case, his personal visit to Bagdad (like Cong. Jim McTraitor) to kiss up to a mass murdering tyrant/butcher reading Adoph Hitler's script.

Kevin Bacon and Laurence Fishburne also were great and appear to believe their career depends on good outstanding entertainment, not crazy rants without honest substance.

Clint Eastwood directed "Mystic River" brilliantly - a "little government" guy somehow getting several hypocritical liberal democrats to "shut up and act".

Whoever cast this ensemble did a great job.

On a side note, back a bit I heard Clint Eastwood call in (from his vehicle in California) to Mike Savage to straighten out some things about "Mystic River" and Savage treated Clint like he was/is an idiot.

Mike Weiner-Savage is low-rent jerk.



53 posted on 02/25/2005 2:32:30 PM PST by devolve ( My-WWII-Musical-Tribute: http://pro.lookingat.us/WWII.html http://pro.lookingat.us/DeadZone.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: devolve; FlyLow

You've got to ask
yourself one question:
"Do I Feel Lucky ??"
Well do you, punk ?!


Click here or on the pic !!
The Good, the bad, and the Ugly

.


54 posted on 02/25/2005 2:45:57 PM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: what's up
All I know is he was the Republican mayor of Carmel.

He was, but I've read a few interviews and he says he's pretty much a libertarian (lower case "l").

55 posted on 02/25/2005 2:50:14 PM PST by Zhangliqun (What are intellectuals for but to complexify the obvious?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: FlyLow

This author has a point, although one can't help but notice that there were no complaints about nastiness in discourse up until the time conservatives stopped getting their butts kicked & started pushing back, ie. almost the entire last half century.


56 posted on 02/25/2005 2:54:49 PM PST by skeeter ("A nation without borders is not a nation" RW R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhangliqun

Yeah...now I see why he didn't do a whole lot for the Republican party. Too bad.


57 posted on 02/25/2005 3:20:01 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
You said the movie extolls the virtues of euthanasia.

I ask you again to point out where in the film it does that.

The movie does not take a position on the matter one way or the other but merely depicts is as the outcome.

58 posted on 02/27/2005 9:10:23 PM PST by O6ret ("Experts" can be paid to say anything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: FlyLow
Eastwood I was a fan in the 60's 70's 80's 90's and the 00's - today all I can say is you are a filthy scumbag, hollywood filth, burn in hell punk - a man should know his limitations!
59 posted on 03/12/2005 2:54:01 PM PST by Free_at_last_-2001 (is clinton in jail yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson