There is NO SUCH THING as "moderate" Islam.
Posted on 02/25/2005 7:36:52 AM PST by Cornpone
WASHINGTON - Despite the apparent decision by US President George W Bush against renominating him to the board of the US Institute of Peace (USIP), "anti-Islamist" activist Daniel Pipes is working as diligently as ever to protect the United States and the Western world from the influence of radical Islamists.
He has proposed the creation of a new "Anti-Islamist Institute" (AII) designed to expose legal "political activities" of "Islamists", such as "prohibiting families from sending pork or pork by-products to US soldiers serving in Iraq", which nonetheless, in his view, serve the interests of radical Islam.
"In the long term ... the legal activities of Islamists pose as much or even a greater set of challenges than the illegal ones," according to the draft of a grant proposal by Pipes' Middle East Forum (MEF) obtained by Inter Press Service.
Pipes is also working with Stephen Schwartz on a new "Center for Islamic Pluralism" (CIP) whose aims are to "promote moderate Islam in the US and globally" and "to oppose the influence of militant Islam, and, in particular, the Saudi-funded Wahhabi sect of Islam, among American Muslims, in the America media, in American education ... and with US governmental bodies ..."
Schwartz, a former Trotskyite militant who became a Sufi Muslim in 1997, has received seed money from MEF, which is also accepting contributions on CIP's behalf until the government gives it tax-exempt legal status, according to another grant proposal obtained by IPS.
The CIP proposal, which says it expects to receive funding from contributors in the "American Shi'ite community" and in "Sunni mosques once liberated from Wahhabi influence", also boasts of "strong links" with Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and other notable neo-conservatives, such as former Central Intelligence Agency director James Woolsey and the vice president for foreign-policy programming at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), Danielle Pletka, as well as with Pipes himself.
Pipes, who created MEF in Philadelphia in 1994, has long campaigned against "radical" Islamists in the US, especially the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and several other national Islamic groups.
Long before the September 11, 2001, attacks on New York and the Pentagon, he also raised alarms about the immigration of Muslims, suggesting that they constituted a serious threat to the political clout of US Jews, as well as a potential "fifth column" for radical Islamists.
In addition, Pipes has been a fierce opponent of Palestinian nationalism. He told Australian television this month, for example, that Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's Gaza-disengagement plan and his agreement to negotiate with the new Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, were a "mistake" because 80% of the Palestinian population, including Abbas, still favor Israel's destruction.
In 2002, Pipes launched "Campus Watch", a group dedicated to monitoring and exposing alleged anti-Semitic, anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian and/or Islamist bias in teachers of Middle Eastern studies at US colleges and universities.
The group, which invites students to report on offending professors, has been assailed as a McCarthyite tactic to stifle open discussion of Middle East issues.
Pipes' nomination by Bush in 2003 to serve as a director on the board of the quasi-governmental USIP, a government-funded think-tank set up in 1984 to "promote the prevention, management and peaceful resolution of international conflicts", moved the controversy over his work from academe into the US Senate, where such appointments are virtually always approved without controversy.
Pipes' nomination, however, offered a striking exception. Backed by major Muslim, Arab-American and several academic groups, Democratic senators, led by Edward Kennedy, Christopher Dodd and Tom Harkin, strongly opposed the nomination as inappropriate, particularly in light of some of his past writings, including one asserting that Muslim immigrants were "brown-skinned peoples cooking strange foods and not exactly maintaining Germanic standards of hygiene".
Several Republican senators subsequently warned Bush that they would oppose the nomination if it came to a vote, and, in the end, the president made a "recess appointment" that gave him a limited term lasting only until the end of 2004. It appears now that, despite the enhanced Republican majority in the Senate, Bush does not intend to renominate him.
Indeed, both the USIP and Bush now probably regret having nominated him in the first place. During his board tenure, Pipes blasted USIP for hosting a conference with the Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy, charging that it employed Muslim "radicals" on its staff.
That accusation was publicly refuted by the USIP itself, which echoed the complaints of his longtime critics, accusing him of relying on "quotes taken out of context, guilt by association, errors of fact, and innuendo".
Pipes also criticized Bush for "legitimizing" various "Islamist" groups, such as CAIR and the Arab-American Institute, by permitting their representatives to take part in White House and other government ceremonies and for failing to identify "radical Islam" as "the enemy" in the war on terror.
His own disillusionment with Bush is made clear in the AAI draft, which notes that "creative thinking in this war of ideas must be initiated outside the government, for the latter, due to the demands of political correctness, is not in a position to say what needs to be said".
AII's goal, it goes on, "is the delegitimation of the Islamists. We seek to have them shunned by the government, the media, the churches, the academy and the corporate world."
Pipes' complementary goal - to enhance the influence of "moderate" Muslims - is to guide the work of Schwartz's CIP, which is "headed by one born Muslim [its president] and a 'new Muslim', ie an American not born in the faith, as its executive director. This is the best combination for leading such an effort."
The "extremists", according to the CIP proposal, are mainly represented by the "Wahhabi lobby", an array of organizations consisting of CAIR, the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), the North American Islamic Trust, the Muslim Students Association of the US and Canada, the Muslim Public Affairs Council, as well as "secular" groups, including the AAI and the American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee.
"The first goal of CIP will be the removal of CAIR and ISNA from monopoly status in representing Muslims to the American public," the proposal goes on. "So long as they retain a major foothold at the highest political level, no progress can be made for moderate American Islam."
In achieving its goal, CIP cites the help it can expect from its "strong links" to Wolfowitz, Woolsey and Pletka; as well as Senators Charles Schumer and Jon Kyl, among others, "terrorism experts" Steven Emerson of the Investigative Project, Paul Marshall of Freedom House, and Glen Howard of the Jamestown Foundation; and journalists such as Fox News anchors David Asman, Brit Hume and Greta van Susteren, Dale Hurd of the Christian Broadcasting Network; and editors at the New York Post, the Los Angeles Times and the Globe and Mail.
Interviewed by phone, Professor Kemal Silay, "president-designate" of the CIP who teaches Ottoman and Modern Turkish Studies at the Indiana University, told IPS he was not aware that he was to be the group's president, but that he had talked about the group with Schwartz and agrees with both Pipes and Schwartz about the dangers posed by "Wahhabi" groups in the US and the world.
Ali al-Ahmed, director of the Washington-based Saudi Institute and named as CIP's research director in the grant proposal, told IPS he had also talked with Schwartz about the group and strongly supported its goals, although he thought several of the groups listed as part of the "Wahhabi" lobby were more independent.
He also said that he did not know that Pipes was involved with the group.
Pipes "sees all Arabs and Muslims the same, because he has interest in the security of the state of Israel", said al-Ahmed, who publicizes human-rights abuses committed in Saudi Arabia.
Schwartz refused to speak with IPS.
Ping...
ouch that ones got to sting.
The alleged statement was made over ten years ago. I'm trying to corroborate it now.
The alleged statement above, attributed to Daniel Pipes, is a lie. A search of the web attributes that statement to an article Pipes wrote in 1990 that was published in the National Review. The article was about the irrational growth of Muslimphobia and winning strategies to combat Islamism or what I call Islamic fascism.
This is another case of the liberal media and politicians accepting the trash they are being fed by organizations such as CAIR and MAS. Below is a link to the original article. No where can the alleged statement be found and in fact, Daniel Pipes is exceedingly supportive and understanding of moderate Muslims and Islam. "The Muslims are coming! The Muslims are coming! - growth of Muslimphobia.
read later
If it hurts the pain is being caused by a liberal media that is lying to to the world and placing lies in the mouths of people who are trying to find and tell the truth. Daniel Pipes is trying to save people from the leftist insanity which is built totally upon lies and the ignorance of people who continue to believe in our very sick MSM. Our media today will be our undoing if we do not insist on the truth. They have become the vanguard of Islamist fascism.
Anyone know what's behind this assertion?
Ted Kennedy; fed lies by Zogby, CAIR and others, led the charge as I understand it. Another good American has been prevented from serving his country because of the fascist left and MSM lies.
There is NO SUCH THING as "moderate" Islam.
We can always dream, hope and pray but the fact is there are already over one billion Muslims in the world. And we already know there are plenty of fools in this country who just can't avoid the slip into madness so it will continue to grow here. Our best hope is to be informed, aware and ready to challenge their lies and expose the fascists for what they are. Most people just want to live peaceful lives. We need to appeal to that desire while fighting radicalism with truth, resolve and determination. We will win. History has already demonstrated that. The only question is how many causalities there will be in the war between freedom and order and fascism and Islamist anarchy.
I don't think I have ever seen an article with so many "scare quotes." Maybe he should have just put them around the entire article.
They are NOT anarchists. Quite the opposite.
Fascist, although not precisely applicable, is however a useful term.
ping...you may find some interest in this string...
My understanding is that 'islamism' and 'islamicism' are distinct terms, and the latter refers to Islamic fascism.
"Fears of a Muslim influx have more substance than the worry about jihad. West European societies are unprepared for the massive immigration of brown-skinned peoples cooking strange foods and not exactly maintaining Germanic standards of hygiene.*"
He later added the following footnote to the article. Both the original statement and footnote were edited out of the earlier document I found.
"* This sentence has over the years attracted considerable attention. My goal in this article (available at http://www.danielpipes.org/article/198) was to characterize the thinking of Western Europeans, not give my own views. In retrospect, I should either have put the words "brown-skinned peoples" and "strange foods" in quotation marks or made it clearer that I was explaining European attitudes rather than my own. By way of example of those attitudes, here are some quotations from top French politicians from that era."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.