Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Churchill Art Piece Called Into Question
News4 Colorado ^ | 2/24/05 | Raj Chohan

Posted on 02/24/2005 10:19:19 PM PST by Fizzie

Churchill Art Piece Called Into Question

by CBS4 News reporter Raj Chohan

Feb 24, 2005 8:03 pm US/Mountain BOULDER, Colo. (CBS4) Boulder County resident Duke Prentup has been a fan of native American art for as long as he can remember. That love of art took him to the home of Ward Churchill in the early 1980's, where Prentup bought several pieces of Churchill's art, including a serigraph titled "Winter Attack."

"I have enjoyed them ever since immensely, they're obviously up inside my house," Prentup said.

Last month came a stunning revelation, though, as as Prentup flipped through a 1972 book called The Mystic Warriors of the Plains written and illustrated by the late artist Thomas E. Mails. He found a sketch that was strikingly similar to the Churchill piece.

(Excerpt) See the rest of the article, and photo comparisons of the 2 pieces of art here:

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 90largewasted; art; artwork; campusradicals; churchill; churchillphony; churchillplagiarism; cigarstoreindian; commiefake; commieliar; cu; disownedbyindians; fakeartist; fakeindian; fakepowwow; flyerfoundit; forgery; forkeddung; fraud; hateamericafilth; hatingamerica; indian; plaigerist; professor; redbutnoindian; sittingbullshit; thief; traitor; ucdisgrace; wardchurchill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 641-643 next last
Comment #281 Removed by Moderator

To: phinnious

Welcome to Free Republic!

282 posted on 02/25/2005 3:20:27 AM PST by Flyer (The contents of this information is for your exclusive use and should not be forum curran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
It won't be long now; he's gonna blow.

He's a phony or it wouldn't bother him. lol!

283 posted on 02/25/2005 3:33:27 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Howlin


284 posted on 02/25/2005 3:34:58 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Flyer
Stop picking on poor old Ward Churchill.
If you make him mad, he'll copy all your stuff.

Seriesly, good find!

285 posted on 02/25/2005 3:36:19 AM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool

He thinks he is so cool! PUKE!

286 posted on 02/25/2005 3:36:32 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Flyer

We just miss some meowchmeat?

287 posted on 02/25/2005 3:42:53 AM PST by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

Yeah. I didn't report 'em, but I guess someone did. They said Ward Churchill could kick our ass.

288 posted on 02/25/2005 3:46:00 AM PST by Flyer (The contents of this information is for your exclusive use and should not be forum curran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: All

Note: Not a direct link.

American Indian Art and Artists

In Search of a Definition

By Ward Churchill

"Your images are interesting, even beautiful. But I'm afraid I
could never buy one because they're too modernistic to be really
Indian." Non-Indian woman observing the author's images during solo
exhibition at the Institute for American Indian Arts Museum - Santa
Fe, New Mexico, 1982. "Your work is too traditionally-orientated to
sell here. We deal in contemporary art." Representative of the
Elaine Horowitz Gallery to the author during the same show - Santa
Fe, New Mexico, 1982. The phrase, American Indian art, immediately
presents me with a problem because we are dealing with a basic
misnomer. "Art", like "philosophy" and "religion", is not an
American Indian concept. It is a notion and category of activity
imported from Europe right along with the horse, firearms, trade
beads and smallpox. In this sense, contemporary efforts to define
what is traditional American Indian art and who are legitimate
American Indian are more than passingly absurd.


At this point, we find the stylistic restrictions that once
served to constrict the development of modern Indian art supplanted
by other mechanisms. And, after the fashion of advanced colonial
systems everywhere, the dominator has duped the dominated into
using such devices against themselves. The most glaring example is
a group in Santa Fe, New Mexico, headed by painter David Bradley,
who insist that no one lacking a certain amount of Indian blood or
possessing a federally-issued certification of his/her Indian-ness
id entitled to be described as an American Indian artist.
Regarding the first point, I would say that application of a
"blood quantum" standard to identification of a people amounts to
adoption of a eugenics code no different in principle from that
used by the Nazis against the Jews, the Afrikaners against blacks
and "coloreds" in South Africa, or by the Israelis against
Palestinian Arabs. Blood quantum in any guise is a virulently
racist proposition and deserves to treated as such.
As to the U.S. government certification of tribal membership, it
is an absolute denial of American Indian national sovereignty, just
as if the U.S. were to begin to stipulate who is and who is not to
be considered a member/citizen of France or Belgium. Definition of
it's own membership or citizenry is the INTERNAL PEROGATIVE of ANY
sovereign nation. No nation has the right to impose upon another
the definition of its citizenry as the U.S. has historically done
to Native Americans. The present demands of the Bradley group -
designed to improve their own "take" in market proceeds - obviously
leads directly AWAY from the exercise of indigenous sovereignty in
North America. Correspondingly, they retreat from the needs and
emergent realities of Indian life and thence from any vestige of
traditional aesthetic function.
It matters little to me what pedigree is held by any Indian
artist. Still less am I concerned with the success evident in their
sales records. What DOES count is the extent to which their art
informs and reinforces the contemporary American Indian struggle to
regain the standard of dignity and self-sufficiency once enjoyed by
all peoples indigenous to thos hemisphere. To this extent, Indian
art can never be a formal artistic or aesthetic proposition. To the
contrary, it MUST be an inherently political, spiritual and
socially activist process. This is the spirit which guides my own
production of objects, and the standard by which I measure my own
success or failure. For me, nothing else is, or could be, truly

289 posted on 02/25/2005 3:46:27 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Fizzie

"Simply stunning. This is a mirror image. "

- This is all quite easily explained. You see, the original picture was called "Winter Attack" whereas Mr. Churchill's art could simply be entitled, "Return From Winter Attack".

290 posted on 02/25/2005 3:51:28 AM PST by finnigan2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze
Hmm, seems he has a habit of copying the art of others.

Check this out:

291 posted on 02/25/2005 3:53:41 AM PST by Marak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
Ward Churchill original

"Flyer meets Michelle Malkin" - 2002

Ward Churchill original

292 posted on 02/25/2005 3:55:15 AM PST by Flyer (The contents of this information is for your exclusive use and should not be forum curran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: Flyer
I think that one's for sale on ebay.

You really shouldn't mess with Churchill.. he's a Native American you know.

293 posted on 02/25/2005 3:58:09 AM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: Fizzie

294 posted on 02/25/2005 3:58:17 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

295 posted on 02/25/2005 3:59:55 AM PST by DBeers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Dang, dang, dang!!! This is what I get for wasting my time on that STUPID UFO thread last night!! I miss all the good stuff.

I am henceforth searching for YOUR threads before I go anywhere else. Dang!

Great job!!

296 posted on 02/25/2005 4:01:58 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

297 posted on 02/25/2005 4:04:52 AM PST by DBeers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: JesseJane
Yep. "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" was a great "fiction", no? You see, this is exactly why I figured the blue staters referred to the redstaters as "stupid" after the election. Blue staters believe it is perfectly okay to take advantage of those coined "gullible". Meaning, those not "inside" the inner clacque and cliche of the "far left".

Easily 10 years back, the whine from the left was that they felt "excluded" from the "good ole' boys club" by which "connections" were everything. So, the left created their own "good ole' liberals" club. Which means, they think they are only doing that which conservatives do: lock others out of "advancement and opportunity". Churchill is such an example.

298 posted on 02/25/2005 4:08:59 AM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
It's that hair that made you think that, right?

He's not an Indian.

He's not a paratrooper.

Can't find his thesis.

His story about smallpox on the blankets was a lie.

He fakes pictures.

What have I forgotten?

All the professor groupy, hippy girls on his campus are now afraid that he faked all of his orgasms.

299 posted on 02/25/2005 4:19:50 AM PST by Ghengis (Alexander was a wuss!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Even the position of the feathers in the headdress and the flow of the fringe in the sash are IDENTICAL in the postcard photo and Churchill's "original by me, Ward Churchill, from my own Native American imagination" photocopy artwork.

300 posted on 02/25/2005 4:23:46 AM PST by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 641-643 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson