Posted on 02/24/2005 3:04:31 AM PST by Lindykim
snip...Men having sex with other men is not normal, it is against the plan of nature and is dangerous from many vantage points
Absolutely! And we ought not call what they do as "sex", for it isn't. It's a 'degrading penetration' of the body for reasons that are, fundamentally, at crosspurposes with the design and purpose of the human body.
You've brought out to the light of day one of the 'ick factors' that they are desperate to keep hidden.
I heard a doctor on the radio explain how male/male sex is unhealthy for many physical reasons. I can't describe the physiology of it, but he explained how the rectum is not suited to receiving a male penis. It is meant to expel excriment from the body. He also explained that male sex drive combined with another male sex drive equals disaster as far as disease is concerned.
Yes, and because it's designed, as you say, for 'expulsion,' it's very easily torn and traumatized by what homosexual males do to each other. And then the tears become infected with the toxic bacteria that exists in that part of the body and whose purpose is to rid the body of waste. Result: blood-borne disease and all sorts of other horrible consequences.
God forbid you say the truth of the matter.
As BRAAD as I want to be.
Shalom.
bump
Amen.
Bump & Ping
Nobody has a perfect right to do anything they want in the privacy of their bedroom. Every law and moral imperative that applies outside applies inside too. You may not have sex with an underage person in the privacy of your bedroom, for example. You may not cook meth in your bathroom. The "consenting adults" and "privacy of the bedroom" argument has gotten us to capitulate to the point where they accept almost no limits at all. I'm not sure what to do. Can't arrest them. Perhaps dipping them in hot tar, covering them with chicken feathers, and riding them out of town on a rail might be good.
Jesus said: "And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? Wherefore, they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder." -from THE BIBLE: Matthew 19:4-6
Bump
bump
John said: Nobody has a perfect right to do anything they want in the privacy of their bedroom. Every law and moral imperative that applies outside applies inside too.
Absolutely. Sexual predators are being 'created' every day in the privacy of their bedrooms and homes. Porn is a 'how-to' manual for sex predators. And it flows like a sewer right into every Americans home via the internet.
From the ObscenityCrimes.org website:
"Mr. Pierce, asking if he had "observed a frequent connection between pornography (including stripping) and sexual crimes" and if he would be willing to share his observations in an interview.
NYPD detective (retired) Raymond Pierce
Mr. Pierce responded affirmatively. The resulting interview appears on Morality in Media's Web site, www.obscenitycrimes.org, on the Porn Problems and Solutions page, under the title, "The sexual criminal's relationship to porn."
Here is an excerpt from that interview:
MIM: What are your definitions of "pornography," and related terms like "soft-core pornography," "hard-core pornography," "violent pornography"?
RMP: I have no need to differentiate between "soft core," or "hard core" pornography. I know what the media defines as "soft core" and "hard core." For me it's anything written, spoken, printed, photographed or videotaped to elicit a sexual response from an individual. What the general public may consider soft-core pornography, that's enough stimulation for a criminal. It depends on what goes on in the individual's mind. If there's enough stimulation for a criminal to use to fantasize before committing a crime; sometimes they use it during a crime and many times they use it afterwards.
MIM:So pornography is one word, essentially, for you.
RMP:For me it is yes.
MIM: Do you believe, from your experience, that there's a greater consumption of pornography among sex offenders in contrast to non-offenders?
RMP: In my experience, offenders in general have a heavy exposure to pornography. I
bump
Hmmm - since, by definition, sodomy also includes many common sexual acts between heterosexuals are those people also evil and must they be kept apart from children. Gonna take away the kids of parents who enjoy oral sex with each other?
Thanks for posting this. Bump for a read when I get home.
I see you have the 'gay quibblers' cue card responses down pat.
Excellent post!
If you want on/off the ping list see my profile page.
I'm not claiming otherwise. My position is that consenting adults have the right to engage in whatever private sexual behavior they want with other consenting adults.
Every law and moral imperative that applies outside applies inside too.
Not even remotely true. There are many, many things you are free to do in the privacy of your own home that you cannot do in public. Have sex. Walk around naked. Drink yourself into unconsciousness.
You may not cook meth in your bathroom.
Of course you can't. What's your point?
The "consenting adults" and "privacy of the bedroom" argument has gotten us to capitulate to the point where they accept almost no limits at all.
You are arguing from consequences. That is a logical fallacy. Just because people have used the "consenting adults in the privacy of their own home" argument as justification to engage in certain behavior in public in no way invalidates the original argument. Two guys can bang each other in the privacy of their own homes all they want, but they can't do that in public.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.