Skip to comments.
Swifties Slime Again
NY Times ^
| February 24, 2005
| MAUREEN DOWD
Posted on 02/23/2005 10:15:52 PM PST by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
It's hiring some of the same consultants who helped the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, who dynamited John Kerry, a war hero, by sliming him as a war criminal. Now consultants are confused with the Swiftees, who hammered Kerry for being a traitor after giving aid and comfort to the enemy and calling his comrades war criminals on the basis of the Winter Soldiers' testimony, that couldn't be corrroborated.
1
posted on
02/23/2005 10:15:53 PM PST
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
AARP's super-relentless intelligence network is certainly better than that doddering C.I.A's
Make that Clinton's CIA, ya bitter old hag ...
To: neverdem
3
posted on
02/23/2005 10:18:01 PM PST
by
Petronski
(Zebras: Free Range Bar Codes of the Serengeti)
To: neverdem
Poor Maureen, she is such a bitter old "Sea Hag"
4
posted on
02/23/2005 10:19:10 PM PST
by
MJY1288
(In The War On Terror; Belgium = GWB Piss Mats,... U.S.A = The Liberation of 50 Million so far)
To: NautiNurse; Interesting Times; Nick Danger
Mo Dowd *barf alert* ping!
5
posted on
02/23/2005 10:19:35 PM PST
by
nutmeg
(democRATs = The Party of NO)
To: neverdem
Maureen Dowd - bitter, man hating, fishwife feminista with
terminal PMS.
6
posted on
02/23/2005 10:20:34 PM PST
by
Apercu
("Rep ipsa loquitor")
To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
Mo Dowd *barf alert* ping!
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my miscellaneous ping list.
7
posted on
02/23/2005 10:20:52 PM PST
by
nutmeg
(democRATs = The Party of NO)
To: neverdem
Dowd is applying the concept of Dowding or a Dowdism .
The looney left rides again. I wonder how much effort it takes for her to just make up this manure.
To: neverdem
9
posted on
02/23/2005 10:21:17 PM PST
by
Waco
To: neverdem
That woman is going to die a shriveled up lonely old prune!
I wonder if she ever reads what she writes to get an idea of her own personality? If she doesn't...... she should.
10
posted on
02/23/2005 10:23:58 PM PST
by
GloriaJane
("How Many Babies Are Crying In Heaven Tonight" http://music.download.com/gloriajane)
To: neverdem
![Image Hosted by ImageShack.us](http://img203.exs.cx/img203/7857/lielielie5jw.jpg)
LIES, LIES, all LIES!!!
11
posted on
02/23/2005 10:24:47 PM PST
by
MarineBrat
("God is dead"- Nietzsche,1886. "Nietzsche is dead"- God,1901)
To: Apercu
Dowd has to push her putrid viewpoint now because in a few years the only market for her lunacy will be an obscure community college communist crackpot newspaper. (and she will have a blog which does not allow commentary other than her own)
To: neverdem
"AARP has not taken a position on same-sex marriage."
However, by their silence on this issue, they seem FOR the 'missionary' position....
13
posted on
02/23/2005 10:26:53 PM PST
by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(ATTN. MARXIST RED MSM: I RESENT your "RED STATE" switcheroo using our ELECTORAL MAP as PROPAGANDA!)
To: neverdem
OK folks. Here's an idea. I would guess that none of us buy the NYSlimes, we need to hurt them another way or two. First off, skip posting their articles, or at least those of that Hoe Dow. Also do not even tickle their website. Let it die. Let them all die due to lack of interest. Do not post their articles, do not use their website. Their own circulation is in a tailspin like most other liberal rags.
Here's an ounce of prevention. I can get the TV listings in Boston, but it goes to the Boston Globe site. They consider that success.
Give me the Heralds TV listings.
14
posted on
02/23/2005 10:28:34 PM PST
by
ProudVet77
(It's boogitty boogitty boogitty time!)
To: ProudVet77
I agree, we need to figure out a way to hurt the NYT as an institution.
To: neverdem
In fact, part of the sinister beauty of the Swift Boat method is its viral quality: it slips into a host body - "Inside Politics," say - and hijacks it. Blind pig. Acorn...
To: neverdem
There always seems to be a moment in a MoDo column where she goes overboard in her zeal to be clever while trying to make her point. Here is where she blows it today:
"....and get Americans to rip up Social Security"
See, she goes and writes a sloppy line like that and you end up smiling and shaking your head and merely scanning what's left of her column because you know, once again, that you just can't trust her. When it comes to credibility, she's her own worst enemy.
Didn't the New York Times once upon a time have careful, thoughtful columnists?
MoDo is the best they can do?
By the way, has the New York Times bothered to try to find a token conservative columnist to replace Safire?
To: longtermmemmory
I agree, we need to figure out a way to hurt the NYT as an institution. Sure, buts lets not forget to make them all personally suffer for their many sins.
18
posted on
02/23/2005 10:36:14 PM PST
by
mcenedo
(lying liberal media - our most dangerous and powerful enemy)
To: MarineBrat
19
posted on
02/23/2005 10:38:00 PM PST
by
Choose Ye This Day
("Supporting the Troops" means you want them to WIN. It doesn't mean you just want them to return.)
To: neverdem
Democrats see no Social Security crisis.
20
posted on
02/23/2005 10:39:04 PM PST
by
Choose Ye This Day
("Supporting the Troops" means you want them to WIN. It doesn't mean you just want them to return.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson