If you have read Coulter, which you say you have, then you will realize that she is 10 shades more conservative than any other writer/pundit out there. I cannot think of one issue on which she does not hold a far right (and I mean that as a compliment) opinion. You may not like her looks or her rhetorical style, but a quisling she ain't.
There are very few as conservative as me, but she is one.
And it's to her credit that she is a Schlafley fan. Unfortunately, Ann is no Phyllis Schlafley and never will be.
She, moreso than posters on this thread, ought to know well how insidious and dangerous is the hypocritical homosexual elite primarily the problem of the right. The fact she is here to help Flyover Country rustle up some indignation and defense of the likes of Gannon is unsettling to say the least.
Oh please don't kill me if I find the painting of Gannon as some Victim utterly disgusting and inexcusable.
It strikes me as passing strange we're the party who'll take Karla Fay Tucker's life in a heartbeat -- there being no room for metanoia and sincere conversion among drugged out murderers, I guess -- but rush to the defense of a calculating queen.
To me, there's a world of difference between the bad judgment of a teen and the creepy calculation of an adult with an ability to cash in on the gay porn and escort services of the right's elite while simultaneously making a name for himself by encouraging the homophobia of the rank and file right.
I do admire Coulter's "witty" ability to spin Gannon as Victim with all the adroitness of Karl Rove. But, then again, I've always been fascinated by the art of propaganda and the willing nature of those who buy it. MORE PICS PLEASE!!