And it's to her credit that she is a Schlafley fan. Unfortunately, Ann is no Phyllis Schlafley and never will be.
She, moreso than posters on this thread, ought to know well how insidious and dangerous is the hypocritical homosexual elite primarily the problem of the right. The fact she is here to help Flyover Country rustle up some indignation and defense of the likes of Gannon is unsettling to say the least.
Oh please don't kill me if I find the painting of Gannon as some Victim utterly disgusting and inexcusable.
It strikes me as passing strange we're the party who'll take Karla Fay Tucker's life in a heartbeat -- there being no room for metanoia and sincere conversion among drugged out murderers, I guess -- but rush to the defense of a calculating queen.
To me, there's a world of difference between the bad judgment of a teen and the creepy calculation of an adult with an ability to cash in on the gay porn and escort services of the right's elite while simultaneously making a name for himself by encouraging the homophobia of the rank and file right.
I do admire Coulter's "witty" ability to spin Gannon as Victim with all the adroitness of Karl Rove. But, then again, I've always been fascinated by the art of propaganda and the willing nature of those who buy it. MORE PICS PLEASE!!
I'm not sure you are understanding me. I do not buy the idea that Gannon/Guckert did not deserved to be purged from the press corps. Re-read my earlier numbered post. But the hypocracy is on the left for being the homo & porn tolerant party, then castigating someone for participating in that depravity. Ann is simply pointing that out. If you have read her over the years, you know she is not a homosexual advocate.
BTW, Sclafly is a Coulter fan.
In response to this quote from your post #92...you're a friggin' idiot.