Posted on 02/23/2005 1:28:51 PM PST by leaning_libertarian
That's the problem. This man is a total liar and fraud and con artist. That is not free speech, it is evil. His false claim of Indian ancestry, for example, led to his being appointed at Colorado over two actual Indian applicants. Read the AIM website to see how evil he has been to the actual Indians and their cause. Fraud is evil, just as with the "Reverend" Al Sharpton, though it may be beloved by the MSM. Lying is evil, as Christ pointed out when he spoke of it in connection with the devil. Ward Churchill is evil, though, like the council that dealt with the blind man healed by Christ at the pool of Bethsaida, our council of the MSM will not see it, nor will they see the good that comes from the message of Christ. They will see neither good nor evil, nor will you, but for our nation, our ability to discern good from evil and act for the good and against evil is a paramount concern, now that we have the ability to do something about it. When Ward Churchill stole copyrighted art and sold it in a con as his "original" Indian Art, was that not evil? His advocacy and support of violence against Americans and our nation, is that not evil?
Since it's been shown that Churchill is not a Heap Big Injun Chief, that he makes up stuff and writes about it, that he plagiarizes, that he copies other people's art and sells it as his own, and that he doesn't even have a PhD......
..... how are we attacking academia? Cuz Churchill sure ain't no academic.
No, we're attacking leftist puke frauds and wannabees.
1) Follow the money.
2) Men are horny.
3) People who are not spiritual always want more.
4) People who are genuinely spiritual are pretty nice.
That about sums up humanity.
Leftists don't like it when they are protested. Anti leftists have the right to free speech as well.
Evil? Sorry - start throwing the word evil around and it's game over.
I wish.
Atta Boy!
I thouoght so. It is difficult how anyone who has been alive very long could still be in denial about evil in the world. There is no sin and there is no satan as far as you are concerned, right? All is relative, right?
You are not the friggin Pope to be able to throw a charge of "evil" in an academic discussion. What theological authority do you have? What is theology doing in a discussion of a secular nature? Sorry - you just ended any conversation on the subject.
Scripture is the authority, as Christ plainly said, but then anti-Christian bigots have no understanding of matters of faith. Obviously you are among those who have the delusion that people should never have a judgment about anything, usually misquoting scripture to the purpose. You keep saying that the discussion is ending but you don't shut up.
I never brought up scripture in a secular discussion on politics and academia and free speech.
That's the point. Truth does not need you or anyone else to bring it up. As President Bush has pointed out, it is a guide for those who believe. When God created the world and sent his only son to save us, he did not give an order that politics and academia would be exempt. In fact, ironically, most of our leading universities, apart from land grant public universities, were founded by believers who wanted His Word spread in the world. Now we see the silly notion that there is a separate parallel world where He does not exist. God is in this whether you acknowledge it or not, and for those who believe, Scripure's condemnation of lying as being of the devil means it's wrong for a compulsive con artist and liar like Ward Churchill to be in a position of authority over the young in particular.
President Bush is not a holy man either.
He is a believer. No one claims that he is any holier than anyone else, least of all himself. Your own inability to understand these matters is without limit. Never having had any experience with faith, your pronouncements upon it are like a virgin opining about sexual experience. You haven't a clue.
You make my point. Religion is in everything and you have no control over it being so.
Religion has no place in this discussion.
He whose heart is darkened cannot understand. Those who think that God is not in it: thinking themselves wise, they become fools. The wrath of God is revealed toward those who suppress the truth. His outworkings are not always known to us, but, in a nation inspired at its founding by an overwhelming desire to protect against the fallibility of man and secure the blessings of Divine Providence, there is no right to suppress the truth at taxpayer's expense, much less to outright lie and cheat.
Wrath of God? So we had 9/11 comming to us ? Is that waht you are arguing now?
Not at all, but in your ignorance and arrogance you would see it that way. You really are like a virgin opining about sex. Try and read the first chapters of Paul's letter to the Romans. There it is explained how we cannot judge except in accordance with God's will and ways. For those who believe there is no separate criteria apart from God's will and Christ's admonitions to us in accordance with his will. But, hey, keep on with the mindless sophistry. It continues to expose the inconsistency of your assertions and accusations. Nothing justifies the evil of those who perpetrated 9/11's horror but it would be a mistake to think that these events have no purpose or meaning and it is the heighth of ignorance to think that the attacks of Al Qaeda and Ward Churchill's praise of those attacks and justifications of them are not of the same source and evil.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.