The weather forecasters can’t accurately tell me what tomorrow’s high or low temperature will be, but they can tell me what the temperature is going to be 50 and 100 years from now. Ponder that.
Oh yeah, they are using COMPUTER MODELS, so this global warming BS has to be true. Nod knowingly, curtsy, bow, and genuflect to the computer model oracle. Trash in = trash out.
The crux of the sham is that the science ignorant masses are being led to believe that the complexity of global weather is not only understood, but that it can be accurately modeled!
For example, have the all knowing and all seeing computer models included ALL the effects that perhaps might mitigate a global warming trend? Have these tin foil hat global warming computer model Poly Anna kool aid drinkers considered factors such as if global warming is occurring then the need for heating oil decreases substantially resulting in less pollution?
Kyota protocol – yeah right, this entire global warming thing is nothing more than another extortion attempt by the worlds’ left. This is about money folks. Them taking money out of your pocket and putting it into theirs.
To presume that man has the ability to predict, let alone control the temperature of the earth is not just supreme arrogance, it is stupidity.
To ignore evidence like Alaskan glaciers that are retreating at a rate of 2 feet a year, or red-leaf maples {warm-weather trees} showing up in cold-weather Boundary Waters of Minnesota, is another.
Conservatives please -- go slow on this. Don't get ahead of the evidence. That is the way libs argue. We need to be smarter.
Actually the accuracy rate of weather forecasting 24 hours ahead is very good. However the further ahead in time you go accuracy begins to drop. When you get to long range forecasts of 7 to 10 days ahead you might as well be flipping coins.