> I really get sick of all the greenies whining about Kyoto and greenhouse stuff. One day it's global warming, then it's global cooling, then warming again. They can't seem to make up their minds. And like posted in your post, they are deliberately ignoring all evidence that contradicts their theory.
All these so called scientists just can't admit the earth has natural cycles of heating/cooling.
Guess it's more PC to blame it on those eeeeevil SUVs!
It's got to be a good sign that we have so much time on our hands, the job of surviving has been reduced to such a trivial problem that we can spend gigawatts of mental energy fretting about how nature will make us extinct unless...
What? We start sacrificing maidens again?
Send Earth First! a check every month? Make tofu our official national food?
Elect greenies our leaders?
Wait. Is it that there are tens of thousands of marginally functional people who like to party and invent ways to avoid getting real jobs, and would rather we keep supporting them?
I already have my Save the Gay Handicapped Whales for Jesus sticker on my bicycle.
That's my story, and I'm sticking to it.
The weather forecasters can’t accurately tell me what tomorrow’s high or low temperature will be, but they can tell me what the temperature is going to be 50 and 100 years from now. Ponder that.
Oh yeah, they are using COMPUTER MODELS, so this global warming BS has to be true. Nod knowingly, curtsy, bow, and genuflect to the computer model oracle. Trash in = trash out.
The crux of the sham is that the science ignorant masses are being led to believe that the complexity of global weather is not only understood, but that it can be accurately modeled!
For example, have the all knowing and all seeing computer models included ALL the effects that perhaps might mitigate a global warming trend? Have these tin foil hat global warming computer model Poly Anna kool aid drinkers considered factors such as if global warming is occurring then the need for heating oil decreases substantially resulting in less pollution?
Kyota protocol – yeah right, this entire global warming thing is nothing more than another extortion attempt by the worlds’ left. This is about money folks. Them taking money out of your pocket and putting it into theirs.
To presume that man has the ability to predict, let alone control the temperature of the earth is not just supreme arrogance, it is stupidity.
On one hand we have the claims from the left, who I KNOW to be unreliable sources of info, and who definitely have their underlying motives that could be driving their arguments --- No progress, business is bad, protect every single inconsequential species etc.
But on the other hand, there seems to be a growing list of evidence. It does not seem to be conclusive, at least not yet. But Average temps are rising, winters are warmer, and so are summers, glaciers are retreating, and warm-weather plants are showing up in cold weather places like the Boundary Waters of Minnesota.
There are two reasons for conservatives not to get ahead of either argument here:
[1] Being proved wrong, would destroy credibiblity,just as being proved wrong destroyed the credibility of the left.
[2] If Global Warming IS Real, doing the Right things about it, whatever they are, is the smart thing to do.
Conservatives need to be smart about this.
Call me skeptical...
But...
We don't have all that long to wait to find out...
I believe that about sums it up; enough said.
Sky is falling bump.
>
|
|
|
Excellent post. The truth shall make us free.
bump
Boy, that makes feel a whole lot better, instead of having to run from the ocean for the next 50 years, I can look forward to getting frozen to death in less than 20.
"The excess moisture then fell to the ground as giant blizzards, giant storms and floods (Noah's Deluge type floods),"
I am sure there are those in LA that would agree with that.
read later
Global Warming: Methane Could Be Far Worse Than Carbon Dioxide
Environment
Technology
Methane gas, abundantly trapped as a half frozen slush in the northern hemisphere's tundra permafrost regions and at the bottom of the sea may well be a ticking time bomb, says geologist John Atcheson in an article published by the Baltimore Sun in December last year. Methane is about twenty times stronger as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. Since arctic warming seems to procede faster than expected, there is a real danger that deposits of methane and similar gases trapped in normally frozen ground, may thaw out and "belch" into the atmosphere, wreaking havoc with our computer simulations of global warming.
From here.
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2005/02/01/global_warming_methane_could_be_far_worse_than_carbon_dioxide.htm
Does Robert Felix actually have any credibility? I know he has a book, but I had thought him to be a flake. Newsmax I know is lacking in credibility.
