Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

QUEEN WILL NOT ATTEND WEDDING
Sky News ^ | February 22, 2005 | Staff

Posted on 02/22/2005 1:14:52 PM PST by MadIvan

The Queen will not attend the wedding of Charles and Camilla, the couple have announced.

She will, however, attend the church blessing after the civil ceremony.

The couple are due to get married at the Guildhall in Windsor.

More Follows...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: camilla; charles; enjoytheshackles; humantyranny; monarchysucks; queen; royals; royalwedding; subjectsnotcitizens; turass
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-235 next last
To: MadIvan
Alice Keppel


81 posted on 02/22/2005 1:37:49 PM PST by onyx ("First you look to God, then to Fox News" -- Denny Crane, Republican...lol.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

A lot of monarchists would agree with you on this.


82 posted on 02/22/2005 1:38:23 PM PST by PeterFinn (Why is it that people who know the least know it the loudest?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
King Arthur II

That's what my post said before editing. ;^)

Legally speaking, I'm pretty sure that he'd be just plain old King Arthur.

Which person Albion certainly could use!!!

83 posted on 02/22/2005 1:38:55 PM PST by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: onyx

SLUT!!!!!!!


84 posted on 02/22/2005 1:39:20 PM PST by PatriotCJC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

I had no idea she could designate in her will who will succeed her to the thrown.


85 posted on 02/22/2005 1:39:27 PM PST by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sassbox

You mean 'hooker'?


86 posted on 02/22/2005 1:39:35 PM PST by Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Diogenes
More about it:

Camilla's inherited role as royal mistress

By Ryan Dilley
BBC News Online

She was lover of the Prince of Wales - a strong influence on him and a humiliation for his wife. And she was Camilla Parker Bowles's great-grandmother.

Alice Keppel had the "sexual morals of an alley cat", says historian Victoria Glendinning. "Sexual faithfulness to her husband wasn't a value to her."

And with whom, in 1898, did Keppel embark on her most infamous extramarital affair? None other than the Prince of Wales.

The minor socialite came to be the semi-official escort for the Prince, even after he succeeded his mother - Queen Victoria - to the Imperial throne and was crowned King Edward VII.

She was the notoriously amorous king's last and longest-serving mistress and one of the few people in his circle able to defuse his cantankerous mood swings.

"Alice Keppel was a fantastic help to Edward VII, more help than his wife [Queen Alexandra] could have ever have been," says Christopher Wilson, who has written about Keppel's great-granddaughter, Camilla Parker Bowles.

The family link between the two women, and the parallels of them both having relationships with princes of Wales, is highlighted by a BBC Two documentary being broadcast on Friday.

The young Camilla Shand enjoyed a privileged upbringing - a childhood not so dissimilar to that experienced by her notorious ancestor almost a century before. The Keppel family rather revelled in Alice's royal connection (particularly the possibility that Camilla's grandma Sonia was of royal blood), and Camilla was said to been "in awe" of her great-grandmother.

"Camilla saw how you could be a successful support to someone in an exposed public position. She learned a great deal from [Alice], and was able to enact it for herself," says Mr Wilson.

This "enacting" began when horse-mad Camilla's path crossed that of Edward VII's great-great-grandson Charles, the newly invested Prince of Wales, at the polo matches.

"Prince Charles was very wet behind the ears when it came to women, but on horseback he looked like a god," says Mr Wilson.

The pair quickly became lovers, despite Camilla being involved with a cavalry officer, Andrew Parker Bowles, and warnings to Prince Charles from palace officials that the match was doomed because Camilla was not a virgin.

However, even Camilla's marriage to Parker Bowles in 1973 did not extinguish the feelings Prince Charles had for her.

Penny Junor, the Prince's biographer, says the couple's shared love of horses and The Goons cemented their relationship.

Just as Edward VII and Alice Keppel had done 90 years before, Charles and Camilla arranged to rendezvous at the country estates of friends.

"Both couples were surrounded by fantastically close-knit coteries of friends. People who would rather have had their heads chopped off rather than discuss with anyone who they'd had under their roof," says Ms Junor.

Camilla had a hand in helping Prince Charles buy his Highgrove estate - conveniently close to her home - and even advised her lover on his choice of the all-important bride who would provide Charles with an heir and the nation with its future king.

In 1980, the 19-year-old Lady Diana Spencer was given the seal of approval. Many in the royal circle thought the shy Diana would be a "quiet little mouse" and cause her husband and his mistress as little trouble as Queen Alexandra had her errant royal husband.

While she shared much with the fashion-conscious and charitably-minded Queen Alexandra, as Princess Diana's fairy tale marriage quickly disintegrated, she proved herself to be anything but mousy.

This was not the only place where Camilla's path departed from that of her great-grandmother.

In Edwardian high society, loveless marriages and discreet serial bed-hopping were more acceptable than divorce. "You didn't think you were a bad woman or an immoral woman if you slept with a man other than your husband," says historian Victoria Glendinning.

However, by the late 20th Century such shenanigans were deemed more reprehensible - though some argue that the artistocracy has been slow to catch up.

Also, the mass media - which so careful coded its references to Edward VII's female companions - had taken a far more explicit interest in the love lives of the great and the good.

But despite the very public humiliations Camilla has suffered since her affair with Prince came to light - partly due to Princess Diana's discussions with journalists and writers - she may in the end fare better than her great-grandmother.

When Edward VII died in 1910, Alice Keppel found that the considerable influence she had enjoyed for 12 years was stopped with the beating of the king's heart.

A woman seen by some as a power behind the throne was not even permitted to sign the book of condolence for her dead lover.

Regards, Ivan

87 posted on 02/22/2005 1:40:24 PM PST by MadIvan (One blog to bring them all...and in the Darkness bind them: http://www.theringwraith.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

I can imagine Diana is laughing at them all now!!!


88 posted on 02/22/2005 1:40:24 PM PST by WestCoastGal (Re: Nascar drivers...They're like Doberman Pinchers with a hand grenade in their mouths."~BORIS SAID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Queen will not attend the wedding of Charles and Camilla, the couple have announced. She will, however, attend the church blessing after the civil ceremony.

If she is trying to make a statement by not going to the wedding but going to the (hello?) ministerial blessing, what is the difference in the eyes of Christendom / United Kingdom-dom?

89 posted on 02/22/2005 1:40:50 PM PST by GretchenM ("Where did gravity come from? Natural selection acting on mutations?" James Perloff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenes

lol...no she managed to be a hooker quite well!


90 posted on 02/22/2005 1:41:04 PM PST by sassbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Has there ever been any discussion as to the "illegitimacy" of Harry?
91 posted on 02/22/2005 1:41:24 PM PST by PatriotCJC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: onyx; prairiebreeze
Hey, Alice was a looker.....fit to be a king's mistress.

And she must have been very, very good 'cause she had a curl right in the middle of her forehead!

Leni

92 posted on 02/22/2005 1:41:28 PM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: GretchenM

The Queen, it seems to me, is doing as little as she can get away with, without it being an open bust-up in the Royal Family.

Regards, Ivan


93 posted on 02/22/2005 1:41:51 PM PST by MadIvan (One blog to bring them all...and in the Darkness bind them: http://www.theringwraith.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: PatriotCJC
Well, Lillie Langrty was also one of his mistresses.

Diana and Lillie resemble one another, IMO.


94 posted on 02/22/2005 1:42:08 PM PST by onyx ("First you look to God, then to Fox News" -- Denny Crane, Republican...lol.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: PatriotCJC
Has there ever been any discussion as to the "illegitimacy" of Harry?

Not to my knowledge.

Regards, Ivan

95 posted on 02/22/2005 1:42:27 PM PST by MadIvan (One blog to bring them all...and in the Darkness bind them: http://www.theringwraith.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Endeavor

"So you're saying that upon her death, William will become King instead of Charles? Did Charles get the memo?"

-LOL. Very funny, no he was at an off site focus group that day, I think it was up at Balmooral.


96 posted on 02/22/2005 1:42:59 PM PST by johnnycap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Hmmmm ... Camilla seems to have Mother In Law problems already huh?


97 posted on 02/22/2005 1:43:01 PM PST by Mo1 (Question to Liberals .. When did supporting and defending Freedom become a bad thing??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

See #94... Lillie Langtry was the beautiful one.


98 posted on 02/22/2005 1:43:12 PM PST by onyx ("First you look to God, then to Fox News" -- Denny Crane, Republican...lol.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Just that he has such a resemblance to the Tank Commander guy that shacked up with Diana.


99 posted on 02/22/2005 1:43:33 PM PST by PatriotCJC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Ivan, I haven't thought Charles would sit on the throne since Diana's [tragic accidental death][murder](choose one). I only hope it's neatly done and doesn't come to a removal more like the first Charles than the second James.

I must say, I've always thought he was more than something of a bozo as I've learned about the lad over the years.

I'm honestly not sure Wills is any better. He's young, reasonably handsome I suppose, but callow and apparently at least as shallow as his sire. Sigh. I think the royal Germans are about played out. Where's Harry Tudor when England needs him?

100 posted on 02/22/2005 1:43:49 PM PST by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-235 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson