Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hunter S. Thompson: The Death of Gonzo Journalism
CHRONWATCH.COM ^ | FEBRUARY 22, 2005 | DR. GREGORY BORSE

Posted on 02/22/2005 11:43:18 AM PST by CHARLITE

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 02/22/2005 11:43:24 AM PST by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Man, lots of articles about HST popping up here!


2 posted on 02/22/2005 11:45:36 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Thomas Wolfe is a pioneer of the “new journalism” of the sixties, the meshing of the personal with the public.

If that's the definition then the Icelandic Sagas were the first example. They say our distinctions between historical and fictional writing doesn't apply to them.
3 posted on 02/22/2005 11:47:51 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Because he's Deep Throat.


4 posted on 02/22/2005 11:48:33 AM PST by rabidralph (Congratulations, Pres. Bush and VP Cheney!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Borges

His writings were ... significant.

Someone shold have notices his decline into this stage of depression.

unless he didnt do it himself... (cue mysterious music)


5 posted on 02/22/2005 11:50:53 AM PST by Mr. K (this space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
‘I'd blown my mind, couldn't work,’ he told Playboy. ‘So finally I just started jerking pages out of my notebook and numbering them and sending them to the printer. I was sure it was the last article I was ever going to do for anybody.’

And pissed off a lot of drunken writers who did the same thing and got fired.

6 posted on 02/22/2005 11:52:30 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE; Constitution Day
Hunter S. Thompson: The Death of Gonzo Journalism

Gone. So?

7 posted on 02/22/2005 11:57:27 AM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Who?


8 posted on 02/22/2005 11:58:16 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Posted on Tue, Feb. 22, 2005

Author offered hints before suicide




The Boston Globe

If one of Hunter S. Thompson's last wishes comes true, the body of the maverick journalist will be cremated this week and his ashes blasted from a cannon across his sprawling ranch in Woody Creek, Colo.

That will be the extent of Thompson's funeral, as outlined in his will, said George Tobia Jr., a Boston-based entertainment lawyer who represented Thompson for the past 15 years. Tobia said he spent a few hours every week, often in the wee hours of the night, fielding requests from and chatting up the man who created gonzo journalism.

In a telephone interview Monday, Tobia said that only in retrospect does it makes sense that the 67-year-old author sat in his kitchen Sunday afternoon, stuck a .45-caliber handgun in his mouth, and killed himself while his wife listened on the phone and his son and daughter-in-law were in another room. His wife had no idea what had happened until she returned home later.

Thompson, a former Rolling Stone magazine contributor known for his self-styled, freewheeling writing, chronicled the downfall of President Nixon and authored books including Hell's Angels and Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.

Tobia, 43, who said he spoke to Thompson at least five times in the last week, said his client and friend didn't leave a note, only conversations and obscure directions to friends and family in recent days.

"This was definitely not spur of the moment," said Tobia, who plans to fly to Colorado today to help carry out Thompson's wishes.

"He arranged to have things dealt with, and he wanted his family close by, but he didn't want anyone to know -- he didn't want anyone to try to stop him. In a weird way, he wanted it to be, I think, a celebration."

Tobia noted that he and Thompson had discussed suicide in the past and that Thompson had discussed it with others.

The decision, Tobia said, had nothing to do with the re-election of President Bush or the trend in national politics; nor did Thompson have any significant financial problems.

Thompson's estate, including land, archives, royalties and other valuables, is worth millions, Tobia said.

The best explanation, perhaps, is that in recent months Thompson had chronic pain from back surgery and an artificial hip. He also broke his leg on a recent trip to Hawaii and was limping, which made it difficult for him to travel.

"He did not want to exist as an invalid or as someone who needed constant care. It wouldn't suit his sense of self," Tobia said.

The one clue, in retrospect, that something changed recently was Thompson's decision that it wasn't so important that his papers and archives be sold to the highest bidder. The money would have helped him in later years.

Thompson told friends including Tobia, a trustee of Thompson's estate, last week that it was more important that his archives not be sold piecemeal and that a proper home, such as a university, be found for them.

"There was no one thing you would point to and say, 'Oh ... he's going to kill himself,' " Tobia said. "It wasn't clear last week suicide was imminent, but now it adds up."


9 posted on 02/22/2005 11:59:17 AM PST by Bommer (JFK - "Pay any Cost! Bear any Burden" TFK "I'll pay what you want and bare my @ss!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
the point of gonzo isn't about the individual getting swallowed up by anything, though that happened to HST, it's about personalizing the story. It's the difference between a dry and impersonal presentation of the facts discovered and allowing the reader/ viewer a peak behind the curtain to see how this was discovered. I think the biggest effect of gonzo can be seen in what's happened to educational/ documentary TV in the last 20 years, we've moved away from those dry Nova specials with the faceless narator to a style where you get to see people going after the story dealing with the sideline issues and commenting on their own efforts. It's the difference between showing the Steps of Moses and showing your show's host climbing the Steps of Moses commenting about the emotional weight of being there and the physical weight of being there in July when it's 120 degrees on the Sinai peninsula. The later is gonzo, and gives the viewers a sense of place.
10 posted on 02/22/2005 12:04:08 PM PST by discostu (quis custodiet ipsos custodes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Someone shold have notices his decline into this stage of depression.

And what?
Try to hold an intervention on HST?

I can't imagine a less likely subject.
He would have ripped out their spleens

So9

11 posted on 02/22/2005 12:05:01 PM PST by Servant of the 9 (Trust Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: discostu
we've moved away from those dry Nova specials with the faceless narator to a style where you get to see people going after the story dealing with the sideline issues and commenting on their own efforts

Michael Moore immediatley comes to mind.

12 posted on 02/22/2005 12:06:52 PM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus

To a degree yes, but that shouldn't be held against gonzo, it's not gonzo's fault Moore is a lying bag of puss. But definitely putting the documentarian in front of the camera and showing his attempts to get the interview instead of just the interview is gonzo. IMHO the guy that moved gonzo to TV was James Burke with his series War Walks, that move from simply showing the room where Wellington gave final orders before battle to having the host stand in the room discussing what Wellington could view from there was a big change, and for the better as it really removed a lot of the dry dull shell from around documentaries, making them much more approachable and human.


13 posted on 02/22/2005 12:11:21 PM PST by discostu (quis custodiet ipsos custodes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Thomas Wolfe is a pioneer of the “new journalism” of the sixties, the meshing of the personal with the public.

You'd think a professor of English would know the difference between Tom Wolfe and his namesake Thomas Wolfe of "Look Homeward Angel" fame. Tom Wolfe did indeed venture into new literary waters with fine work like "The Kandy-Colored Tangerine-Flake Streamline Baby" and "The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test" and more. And thankfully he's one of the more conservatively-oriented novelists writing today.

14 posted on 02/22/2005 12:12:52 PM PST by Bernard Marx (Don't make the mistake of interpreting my Civility as Servility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Who? Don't know who he was or what he did.


15 posted on 02/22/2005 12:15:21 PM PST by cubreporter (U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu
One journalistic form that HST blew away was the hagiography of Presidential candidates featured by Theodre White's treatment of the 1960 Presidential Election.

After 'Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail' it was impossible to put the halo back on Presidential election campaigns.

16 posted on 02/22/2005 12:18:36 PM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
I read the accolades given Thompson by Tom Wolfe in today's WSJ...And I think Wolfe is a fantastic writer...

However, Thompson was a weird, confused person whose fame came from doing the unexpected and stupid which got him attention...such as sounding a boat horn in a restraunt.

The man was a psycho.

17 posted on 02/22/2005 12:24:26 PM PST by squirt-gun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus

OK I'll admit it, I had to look up hagiography, but you're right. And of course not just the presidential candidates but the press on the campaign trail, the view of the zoo plane and press row during the conventions, it's now standard during any mass covered event like a convention or the Super Bowl to have some story about how the story is covered. My favorite example of that comes from PJ O'Rourke during the Gulf War when he goes to where all the TV journalists gather to write their stories and finds them pouring through the print accounts and says "you can't do that, everything we write is based on what we see on your shows".


18 posted on 02/22/2005 12:25:15 PM PST by discostu (quis custodiet ipsos custodes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: discostu
PJ O'Rourke during the Gulf War

The funniest thing I ever read by him was when he covered the Nick-a-ra-wa election that threw the Sandanista thugs out of power. His discription of the deslolated American symps "The Sandalistas" still put me in stitches.

19 posted on 02/22/2005 12:30:38 PM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cubreporter

'swhy you'll always be a rookie.


20 posted on 02/22/2005 12:32:54 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson