Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court rejects challenge to [Roe Vs. Wade] abortion ruling
Findlaw ^ | 2-22-05 | HOPE YEN

Posted on 02/22/2005 8:21:37 AM PST by OXENinFLA

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected a challenge to its landmark 1973 ruling legalizing abortion by the woman once known as "Jane Roe," who was at the center of the historic U.S. case.

Without comment, justices declined to hear the appeal from Norma McCorvey and thus dodged a highly charged political debate for now. McCorvey's protest of Texas' abortion ban led to the Roe v. Wade ruling establishing a constitutional right to abortion.

McCorvey, who says she now regrets her role in the decision, argued in court filings that the case should be heard again in light of evidence that abortion harms women.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.findlaw.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: abortion; janeroe; normamccorvey; roe; roevwade; scotus; wade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
}:o(
1 posted on 02/22/2005 8:21:41 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cgk; Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...
PING...
2 posted on 02/22/2005 8:22:33 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

This is getting ridiculous. We've gotta get our judges in.


3 posted on 02/22/2005 8:23:16 AM PST by TBarnett34 ("Unnngh!" -John F'n Kerry, 11/2/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

Most unfortunate. We'll keep fighting, though.

We need more conservatives on the court.


4 posted on 02/22/2005 8:25:08 AM PST by wk4bush2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004

Yeah... that'll happen. I've no confidence left in our Government. At any level.


5 posted on 02/22/2005 8:26:22 AM PST by Dead Corpse (The neighborhood is pretty dead at night, and I'm the one to blame....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

"Without comment, justices declined to hear the appeal..."

Gutless turds. At least have the courage to admit WHY you're doing this.


6 posted on 02/22/2005 8:26:28 AM PST by ItsOurTimeNow ("The left is nothing but puke in human form." (satchmodog9))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

I hate to say this, but we conservatives may have to accept that abortion on demand is a permanent part of the landscape in America. The USSC won't even allow a ban on partial-birth abortion to be enacted in the states. They clearly have no stomach at all for revisiting this issue.


7 posted on 02/22/2005 8:29:25 AM PST by jpl (Islam is a religion of peace, as in "Rest in Peace".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

So sad what this nation has come to. And to think that these judges are the best we've got. Prayers that it is not too late to turn America back to God.


8 posted on 02/22/2005 8:29:55 AM PST by trustandobey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpl

They will if we replace the judges. Think long term.


9 posted on 02/22/2005 8:30:24 AM PST by Richard Kimball (It was a joke. You know, humor. Like the funny kind. Only different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ItsOurTimeNow
Gutless turds. At least have the courage to admit WHY you're doing this.

The U.S. Supreme Court and liberals admitting they slaughtered millions of babies for their own personal preferences? They would sooner admit the genocide they initiated in Vietnam or disavow communism. Good luck.

10 posted on 02/22/2005 8:33:24 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball
They will if we replace the judges. Think long term.

I understand what you're saying, but to me it seems almost a mathematical impossibility. It would require not only conservative Republican presidents to get elected for the next 15-20 years, but a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate for the next 15-20 years as well, as the Democrats clearly have made abortion on demand their #1 litmus test for the court. We can't even get the lower courts filled with Bush's appointees right now.

11 posted on 02/22/2005 8:33:54 AM PST by jpl (Islam is a religion of peace, as in "Rest in Peace".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
for now...
12 posted on 02/22/2005 8:39:50 AM PST by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jpl
may have to accept that abortion on demand is a permanent part of the landscape in America

Accept? NEVER! We'll gird ourselves with the armor of God and fight it with every ounce of strength we have.

13 posted on 02/22/2005 8:40:32 AM PST by Former Fetus (fetuses are 100% pro-life, they just don't vote yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
This move fits right in with the U.N. Charter. Two of the Supremes went to a meeting overseas about U.N. policy and shortly after they returned gave an interview om ABC in which they said that the "Constitution was getting to the point where it is irrelevant" in this global world. I heard Justice Sandra Day O'Conner say it. Next they will approve euthanasia.

There is NO justice left in America!!! We have been betrayed once again by the highest court in the land and those sorry SOB'S KNOW they are appointed for life. I sure hope our congress does something about it, but I don't count on them to do it.

14 posted on 02/22/2005 8:45:54 AM PST by NRA2BFree (NO AMNESTY, NO UN, NO PC, NO BS, NO MSM, NO WHINY @SS LIBERAL BEDWETTERS, NO LIBERAL JUDGES! YEAH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpl

Have faith brother, we have been watch a slow motion train wreck since 1994.

The Democrate Party was take over by the far left raticals culimnating with the election of Clinton, he became the "Engineer" with his lovely wife Bruno as the Fire Man, and my what a bang up job they have done.

When Bozo and her husband entered the picture the Democatic Party controlled BOTH Houses of Congress, the White House, the Courts, the "Media" and majoriety of the State Governments.

All they have left are the courts, and that is not going well. They are about to be "nuked" on Judical Apointments and the Governed are begining to rise up against the "Activest Judicary".

The panic you see with the Left is the realisation that the engine and the front 7/8 of the train is off the bridge and is draging them with it.

Want to see Clinton's legecy? Just watch this train wreck and smile.


15 posted on 02/22/2005 8:50:44 AM PST by Rumplemeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

no shock on this one.

The Supreme Court, over that past 20 years, has taken a path of not ruling on Constitutional issues (which they are supposed to rule on) and ruling on issues of which the Constitution did not give them authority.

There is no justice with that group.


16 posted on 02/22/2005 8:52:14 AM PST by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trustandobey
And to think that these judges are the best we've got.

They're not....they're just what we have there at the time. Hopefully, in time (the sooner the better) that will change for the better.

II Chron 7:14

17 posted on 02/22/2005 8:54:19 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

lets be honest, this was a long shot from the start.


18 posted on 02/22/2005 8:54:51 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Those who stated that this should not have been brought up at this time were correct. It should have come after another justice or two was appointed when there might have been a chance for success. Poor tactics never help.


19 posted on 02/22/2005 8:58:05 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

They can always reintroduce it later...and they will.


20 posted on 02/22/2005 8:59:54 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson