the above line of thought shows that Michael is by no means seeking what is best for Terri by subjecting her to unnecessary surgery.
If you're gonna starve her, just stop feeding her. And yeah, it IS just that cruel.
My wife's opinion is that Michael wants her dead because he put her there in the first place. If Michael Schiavo assaulted her, as he has assaulted women in the past, causing her brain damage and putting her in the hospital, would he want her to receive therapy that could possibly help her regain her speech or movement? Does this explain why he has denied her any therapy that could help her is this regard?
Why doesn't the court ask these questions?