And if the plain, obvious historical truth doesn't affect you, then why should my words positive, or negative make any difference to you?
But you are mocking your Creator, and the One who loved you and died for you. And that is what you need to focus on.
None of us can do anything here but pray for you, and that is what I've been doing, and will continue to do whenever God brings you to my attention in the future.
You are missing out on the joy of the Lord now, but more importantly will miss out on spending eternity with your Creator if you don't peel the blinders off your eyes before you go to meet Him.
Someone on this thread called you a 'stump.' I said I thought you were seeking the truth. I still think, in spite of all the childish stubborn emotional bluster, that you want to know the Jesus that you pretend didn't exist.
I'm praying that you find the peace that only He can give...........and soon.
Blessings to you, orion.
> plain, obvious historical truth
Incorrect. If I tella tale with some seriously unbelievable aspects to it, the whole tale becomes suspect.
> you are mocking your Creator
Sigh. No, I'm not. It mocks no one to question the validity of a report.
> Jesus that you pretend didn't exist
Again, your biases are getting in the way. I'm not "pretending" he didn't exist. I'm asking for useful evidence that he did. You aren't providing it. The logic you are presenting is *massively* flawed, and would be laughed out of court were this any other topic. And so when I ask for good evidence, you start to rage about "mocking."
> Blessings to you, orion.
I'd rather have the facts. Everything else will then fall into place. But without the facts, it's all speculative handwaving.