> plain, obvious historical truth
Incorrect. If I tella tale with some seriously unbelievable aspects to it, the whole tale becomes suspect.
> you are mocking your Creator
Sigh. No, I'm not. It mocks no one to question the validity of a report.
> Jesus that you pretend didn't exist
Again, your biases are getting in the way. I'm not "pretending" he didn't exist. I'm asking for useful evidence that he did. You aren't providing it. The logic you are presenting is *massively* flawed, and would be laughed out of court were this any other topic. And so when I ask for good evidence, you start to rage about "mocking."
> Blessings to you, orion.
I'd rather have the facts. Everything else will then fall into place. But without the facts, it's all speculative handwaving.
Thanks for the conversation. I'm even more convinced, having reviewed the facts, that Jesus is not only an historical figure, proven by 2,000 years of study, but alive today, reigning in power triumphant.
May you find His peace.