> if people were still alive who witnessed the crucifixion (i.e. it was in THEIR LIFETIME) when the documents were written, and no one disputed it's reality, it is historically valid.
Interesting point of view. All that's needed is for nobody to be on record disputing the validity of a claim? Wow. And here I was thinking that in order for something to be accepted, it needed more than simply not being contradicted at the time.
Here's a little research project for you: Richard Adams Locke.
> Everyone else knows you're stubborn, childish, and wrong.
Yawn. Your ad hominems do not aid your "arguement."
And if the plain, obvious historical truth doesn't affect you, then why should my words positive, or negative make any difference to you?
But you are mocking your Creator, and the One who loved you and died for you. And that is what you need to focus on.
None of us can do anything here but pray for you, and that is what I've been doing, and will continue to do whenever God brings you to my attention in the future.
You are missing out on the joy of the Lord now, but more importantly will miss out on spending eternity with your Creator if you don't peel the blinders off your eyes before you go to meet Him.
Someone on this thread called you a 'stump.' I said I thought you were seeking the truth. I still think, in spite of all the childish stubborn emotional bluster, that you want to know the Jesus that you pretend didn't exist.
I'm praying that you find the peace that only He can give...........and soon.
Blessings to you, orion.