This is only for lurkers, because you are clearly blind of your own choosing, but if people were still alive who witnessed the crucifixion (i.e. it was in THEIR LIFETIME) when the documents were written, and no one disputed it's reality, it is historically valid.
How long do you want to hang on to your uneducated and boneheaded viewpoint here?? You have been proven wrong, and no idiotic references to Bigfoot or Elvis will make you look any brighter. You're the only one who thinks you're cute.
Everyone else knows you're stubborn, childish, and wrong.
> if people were still alive who witnessed the crucifixion (i.e. it was in THEIR LIFETIME) when the documents were written, and no one disputed it's reality, it is historically valid.
Interesting point of view. All that's needed is for nobody to be on record disputing the validity of a claim? Wow. And here I was thinking that in order for something to be accepted, it needed more than simply not being contradicted at the time.
Here's a little research project for you: Richard Adams Locke.
> Everyone else knows you're stubborn, childish, and wrong.
Yawn. Your ad hominems do not aid your "arguement."