Replies

JULIUS CAESAR AR silver denarius. Lifetime portrait issue, struck February-March, 44 BC. 3.4g, large 19mm flan. CAESAR IMPER, laureate head right, Lituus and simpulum behind/ M. METTIVS, Venus standing left, holding Victory. Control letter 'G' in lower left field. RCV 1407, valued at $960 in VF. Very interesting banker's mark, perhaps a monogram, on Caesar's neck. Small test cut above Caesar's head.Circular banker's mark in right reverse field. anker's mark on Caesar's neck. Rare! Significant wear, but a clear portrait of this historical giant. 709857.

JULIUS CAESAR DICTATOR AR silver portrait denarius. CAESAR DICT PERPETUO, Julius' laureate head right / P SEPVLLIVS MACER, Venus standing left with victory and shield. Syd 1072.. Struck January-February 44BC. These portrait issue coins, along with assumption of 'Dictator for Life', (also shown on this coin) are among the major reasons Caesar was assassinated by the Liberators (Brutus, Cassius, and the gang).

(60) Julius Caesar and Marcus Mettius - AR denarius, 44 B.C., 3.78 g. (inv. 91.106).
Obverse: Laureate head of Julius Caesar r., with long neck; CAESAR IMPER(ATOR): Caesar, imperator.
Reverse: Venus Victrix walking l., holding small Victoria in l. and spear in r., with shield at l. side; monogram in l. field; M METTIVS: Marcus Mettius (mint magistrate).
Provenance: Edward Gans, 1959.
Bibliography: J.P.C. Kent, Roman Coins (London 1978) 17.

Bust of Caesar, probably based on his death mask.

Caesar, Museo della Civilta, Rome

Caesar, c. 60 BCE

Arrr. Time to go to bed.

Oh.....sheesh...........I knew I shouldn't have been typing that last night.................the issue was proof of his authorship of the Gallic Wars ..........NOT whether he actually existed. (I'm pretty sure you knew that was what I was talking about, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt). It would be as stupid to say Caesar didn't exist as it is to say Jesus didn't exist.......and I'm not stupid.

You accept Caesar's authorship, and its truthfulness without question............don't you? But you never came up with a date for the nearest document of it (another hint..........it was almost a millenium after Caesar actually lived).

Now please address the other issues I raised, all the documentation that Jesus was an historic figure (and even the Encyclopaedia Britannica's statement that people who question it can't be taken seriously) and your outright lie on this thread that I said the Gallic Wars were forgeries.

If you want to be taken seriously, you'll have to prove that the historic evidence is wrong (which you cannot do), or admit you're wrong.

If you ignore the documentation presented to you, you'll prove (what most of us think), that you're a phony who isn't interested in the truth, and who has done no serious research to find out what the facts really are, because you're afraid of what you'll find out.