You accept Caesar's authorship, and its truthfulness without question............don't you? But you never came up with a date for the nearest document of it (another hint..........it was almost a millenium after Caesar actually lived).
Now please address the other issues I raised, all the documentation that Jesus was an historic figure (and even the Encyclopaedia Britannica's statement that people who question it can't be taken seriously) and your outright lie on this thread that I said the Gallic Wars were forgeries.
If you want to be taken seriously, you'll have to prove that the historic evidence is wrong (which you cannot do), or admit you're wrong.
If you ignore the documentation presented to you, you'll prove (what most of us think), that you're a phony who isn't interested in the truth, and who has done no serious research to find out what the facts really are, because you're afraid of what you'll find out.
> It would be as stupid to say Caesar didn't exist as it is to say Jesus didn't exist.
Actually, rather more so. Caesar was known and written about by his contemporaries. Statues and coinage of him have been found all over the Roman world.
Jesus... does not have nearly the recognition in his world or among his contemporaries.