Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Making airwaves Liberal thought-control cops just can't tolerate Fox News
Calgary Sun ^ | Tue, February 15, 2005 | By Paul Jackson

Posted on 02/21/2005 4:48:48 AM PST by fanfan

Making airwaves Liberal thought-control cops just can't tolerate Fox News

By Paul Jackson -- Calgary Sun

"The CBC would be laughed off the air in the United States. It's so blatantly dishonest," -- Bill O'Reilly, Fox News

Well, Bill, forgive me, but I've been saying that for years.

That said, your nightly presentation, The O'Reilly Factor, has now become my favourite TV show. So much so that, if I have a commitment elsewhere, I tape it. It's a no-miss event.

Yes, friends, through Starchoice I've become a devotee of Fox News, (www.foxnews.com) the most popular all-news TV network in the U.S., and the one the Liberal-dominated Canadian Radio-telecommunications and Television Commission (CRTC) tried to prevent Canadians from watching.

Why? Because it openly gives a voice to conservative commentators rather than the Lib-Left establishment. And, naturally, the thought-control police of the Jean Chretien/Paul Martin regimes can't tolerate anything that doesn't walk the official Lib-Left line.

Think of 1984's George Orwell and his perceptive warning: "I believe totalitarian ideas have taken root in the minds of pseudo-intellectuals everywhere."

They surely have in each and every agency of the Liberal government.

If we Canadians were allowed to hear another viewpoint on the airwaves, we might start having doubts about the propaganda the Liberal machine and its seemingly wholly-owned subsidiaries, the CBC and Maclean's magazine churn out.

Hey, is this a democracy or not? Only, apparently, if you toe to the Lib-left line. If you don't, you're rated as "someone of suspicion," a "heretic," and somewhat "unCanadian."

I guess I am all three in the Liberal Black Book.

Even CTV NewsNet -- my favourite Canadian TV news channel -- has to operate in a straitjacket so its shameless equivalent, CBC Newsworld, gets a free ride on all the big stories -- and gives them a Lib-left slant. If you want fairness, Global-TV is a far better watch than CBC any day of the week.

Whatever, for years Canadians were forbidden to watch Fox News -- Big Brother saw to that -- but the CRTC made one huge error. It gave the green light to the Islamic terrorists' favourite network, al-Jazeera, to pipe its anti-America drivel into Canadian minds, and with that, the charade that there wasn't enough room for another all-news channel fell through.

So now, I get to watch the likes of O'Reilly -- simply the best commentator on TV anywhere -- Sean Hannity, Rita Cosby, Geraldo Rivera, Greta Van Susteren and Col. Oliver North giving me the true goods.

Now, some 20 years ago, when North was being hounded over the arms-for-contras operation (That helped free Nicaragua from Communist rule) I sent $25 US to his defence fund, and have had a soft spot for him ever since. Stars such as Rivera and Van Susteren fled the other networks for Fox News

Fox News' slogan, echoed by all, but I like it especially when quoted by the gorgeous newscaster Page Hopkins, is: "Only one network has Real Journalism. Fair and Balanced. That's why we're Number One."

Fox News is No. 1, too. When asked about this, Ted Turner, founder of CNN (Clinton Network News, as it is mockingly called), spluttered something like, "Yeah, well Adolf Hitler was the most popular politician in Germany for a while, so what do numbers matter?" Obviously, Ted's a poor loser. He should never have got tied up with "Hanoi" Jane Fonda.

Yet aside from being No. 1, Fox News really is fair and balanced. OK, it has frequent conservative guests such as North, Ronald Reagan's secretary of defence Casper Weinberger and Reagan's secretary of state Alexander Haig, but it gives an awful lot of time to Liberals and Democratic senators, including the tiresome Teddy Kennedy -- who still needs to take swimming lessons, majoring in lifesaving -- the fatuous Hillary Clinton, and the ranting minority House leader Nancy Pelosi.

This is quite clever -- the more viewers see and hear the banalities these hypocrites have to say, the more principled and prescient American conservatives appear.

As an aside, the only Democratic senator who is talking sense these days is Joseph Lieberman. A top-notch fellow, who must privately anguish over what his party has become.

To demonstrate, again, how fearful the Liberal establishment in Canada has become over Fox News' appearances in our benighted land, the CBC's Fifth Estate recently did a knife job on it! O'Reilly said Canadians should be ashamed their government was subsidizing such trash. True, Bill, but I thought it was great publicity for Fox News.


TOPICS: Canada; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: canada; fox; foxnews; foxnewscanada; oreilly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
Why? Because it openly gives a voice to conservative commentators rather than the Lib-Left establishment. And, naturally, the thought-control police of the Jean Chretien/Paul Martin regimes can't tolerate anything that doesn't walk the official Lib-Left line.
1 posted on 02/21/2005 4:48:48 AM PST by fanfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fanfan

I'll never forget the day Murdoch announced he was creating a new 24 cable news station to compete with CNN. The MSM laughed. They're not laughing today.


2 posted on 02/21/2005 4:55:43 AM PST by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

What a good article to start the day off with!


3 posted on 02/21/2005 4:56:50 AM PST by Old Grumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: fanfan

I still shudder at the thought that the USA has become so socialistic that a liberal like Geraldo Rivera would be thought of as a "conservative" ?!!?


5 posted on 02/21/2005 4:58:38 AM PST by CLS (www.OUTOFTIMERADIO.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CLS

This is why FOX is Fair and Balanced! To all those naysayers that complain about some of the leftist that appear on FOX, thats what makes the programming so great. Yes, Juan Williams and the likes of him are lefties but so what, I would rather hear both sides than just the party line, it shows how foolish they are.


6 posted on 02/21/2005 5:05:54 AM PST by eastforker (Ask me about a free satellite TV system!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CLS

It wouldn't be "Fair and Balanced" if it was ALL conservative.
Fox has never claimed to be a "conservative network". That's a tag that the Liberals put on it, and they NEVER get anything right.


7 posted on 02/21/2005 5:07:28 AM PST by sd-joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CLS

It's actually Canada that has become so socialist.


8 posted on 02/21/2005 5:07:41 AM PST by fanfan (" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fanfan
Bump for Mr. Jackson and I hope; by association, many like-minded Candadiens.

Now Greta and Geraldo is a longer story; but nonetheless - despite Geraldo's insufferable and idiotic case of 'Michael-Molester Blindness' - I am glad that both he and Greta make their home at Fox News. . .

9 posted on 02/21/2005 5:08:52 AM PST by cricket (Just say - NO U.N.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

The liberals have started referring to Murdoch's network as "Faux News." That's rather clever. Of course, the most brilliant and effective such one-liner ever crafted was our very own "Sore Loserman." Such sloganeering can actually have quite significant effects.


10 posted on 02/21/2005 5:11:50 AM PST by sourcery (Resistance is futile: We are the Blog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

oops! 'Candadiens' - reads better as Canadians. . .(Candadiens are extra-terrestrial - though more than few now live in Canada)


11 posted on 02/21/2005 5:14:06 AM PST by cricket (Just say - NO U.N.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan; UpHereEh; MadIvan; Zacs Mom; NorthOf45; JBGUSA; GMMAC; Don W; JudyinCanada; Grig

Ping


12 posted on 02/21/2005 5:15:22 AM PST by fanfan (" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sd-joe

"It wouldn't be "Fair and Balanced" if it was ALL conservative.
Fox has never claimed to be a "conservative network". That's a tag that the Liberals put on it, and they NEVER get anything right."

According to a poll (sorry, no links) I remeber, FOX News split 80/20 contributing to Dems/Pubs in 2004 presidential election, while MSM was a 96/4 split. They are still heavily Dems, but appparently believe in presenting both sides.


13 posted on 02/21/2005 5:41:15 AM PST by enigma825
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Not agreeing with everything O'R says means slamming him?


14 posted on 02/21/2005 5:41:16 AM PST by Mi-kha-el ((There is no Pravda in Izvestiya and no Izvestiya in Pravda.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

"Oddly, those who would take him off the air for speaking his mind are both left and right."

Uh, just because I think he's a mental lightweight, and no conservative by any stretch, doesn't mean I "would take him off the air", and I doubt anyone else who dislikes him on the Right would suggest doing so either.

Qwinn


15 posted on 02/21/2005 5:46:03 AM PST by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: Baynative

When you say "would take him off the air", are you talking about hoping he gets canned cause he sucks? Or are you talking about having the government -force- him off the air, the way the Canadian government did?

I have a very hard time believing that conservatives would support the latter. I suspect you're conflating an expression of desire for the former with the latter, which is obviously unfair on an entire slew of different levels.

Qwinn


17 posted on 02/21/2005 5:52:14 AM PST by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

One cannot rave about Fox News without mentioning Brit Hume. Simply the best they have on a number of fronts. Fair, smart, funny, honest and no-nonsense. If not for the enormous news competition he has; locals at 6pm and all the networks hitting him at 6:30pm, his numbers would dwarf B.O..


18 posted on 02/21/2005 6:29:04 AM PST by thecanuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qwinn

Bottom line is Fox News is DOMINATING the ratings. Pure and simple. The Nelson ratings show every single Fox News primetime show besting in the ratings than any other show on CNN, MSNBC or CNBC.

I have always said the deep down the majority of Americans are conservative in nature. FNC is not a "Conservative" network but it does give them the best platform, the most honest platform to speak from.

The viewing public are the ones that decide which network has the best ratings. Personaly O'Rielly is a bit "Pompus" for my liking but I still watch.

Funny you never read or hear WHY Fox News has DOMINATED the ratings. Do the liberals think that Karl Rove has secretly installed chips in Cable and Sat boxes to block CNN and others for FNC? The way they are acting since the elction, I expect to see an article posted here on Freep sayhing exactly that.


19 posted on 02/21/2005 6:38:22 AM PST by TheShaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: thecanuck
One cannot rave about Fox News without mentioning Brit Hume. Simply the best they have on a number of fronts. Fair, smart, funny, honest and no-nonsense. If not for the enormous news competition he has; locals at 6pm and all the networks hitting him at 6:30pm, his numbers would dwarf B.O..

Agreed. Brit Hume is the best thing Fox News has going for it. Oh, if they would only replace the touchy-feely "Fox and Friends" in the morning with a real news show like Hume's.......

20 posted on 02/21/2005 6:39:57 AM PST by Thermalseeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson