Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

No child should have to sacrifice their natural right to have a father and a mother just to satisfy two selfish perverts that place their perverted sexual preferences higher on the priority list than the spiritual and emotional needs of the child.
1 posted on 02/20/2005 11:08:58 AM PST by DirtyHarryY2K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: DirtyHarryY2K
In response gay activist Winnie Stachelberg accused the Secretary of denying children “an education about the diversity of American families.

just let us parents decide how to raise our children, thank you - stay out of our living rooms

(and read my Tagline)

2 posted on 02/20/2005 11:12:57 AM PST by maine-iac7 (."...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DirtyHarryY2K; Texaggie79
When openly lesbian Rosie O’Donnell was asked in an interview how she would react if her adopted son expressed a desire for a father, she replied that he already had expressed such a desire. She had told him, “If you had a daddy, then you wouldn’t have me for a mommy because I’m the kind of mommy that wants another mommy.” She explained adoption by telling her son that “he grew up in another lady’s tummy, that God looked inside and saw there was a mix-up and God brought him to me.” In other words, the boy’s natural desire for a father was a rejection of his mother and God was part of the conspiracy to make him fatherless.

That's pretty sick right there.

3 posted on 02/20/2005 11:17:30 AM PST by BrooklynGOP (www.logicandsanity.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping.

If you want on/off the ping list see my profile page.

4 posted on 02/20/2005 11:17:54 AM PST by DirtyHarryY2K (''Go though life with a Bible in one hand and a Newspaper in the other" -- Billy Graham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DirtyHarryY2K

The program is not, as Stachelberg claims, an effort to promote tolerance, but part of a comprehensive campaign by gay activists to change the culture and marginalize those who oppose the redefinition of marriage. Having lost badly in the 2004 election cycle, gay activists realize that their only hope lies in influencing the next generation to accept their agenda. Therefore, the children are their main target.




Exactly!! with emphasis on "part of a comprehensive campaign by gay activists to change the culture and marginalize those who oppose the redefinition of marriage."


6 posted on 02/20/2005 11:46:32 AM PST by gidget7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DirtyHarryY2K

Thank you so much for posting this. Now, on another note, I put up a post earlier about the fact that on The Simpsons, they will address the subject of same-sex marriage. Does anyone see a trend here? Kids do in fact watch The Simpsons, and it seems that we are inundated with the topic of homosexuality in programs these days. Kids don't need to be exposed to that. I applaud the education Secretary for standing up against this. I would hope that more people do the same. Again, thank you so much for posting this.


7 posted on 02/20/2005 11:54:13 AM PST by FeeinTennessee (This black chick PROUDLY supports President George W. Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DirtyHarryY2K


There’s a big outrage for J Jackson having a bare a breast at the superbowl. But not for this!


Time to contact your State Reps., FCC, WPT, PBS and federal reps. To stop this targeting of children and make confused kids easier targets for seduction. And the stealth corruption and undermineing of parents.


From the FCC page

Obscenity, Indecency, & Profanity
It’s against the Law!
It is a violation of federal law to broadcast obscene programming at any time. It is also a violation of federal law to broadcast indecent programming during certain hours. Congress has given the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) the responsibility for administratively enforcing the law that governs these types of broadcasts. The Commission may revoke a station license, impose a monetary forfeiture, withhold or place conditions on the renewal of a broadcast license, or issue a warning, for the broadcast of obscene or indecent material.


Obscene Broadcasts are Prohibited at all Times


Obscene speech is not protected by the First Amendment and cannot be broadcast at any time. To be obscene, material must meet a three-prong test:

An average person, applying contemporary community standards, must find that the material, as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;......


Read more here

http://www.fcc.gov/parents/content.html




Wisconsin Public Television plans to target homosexual show at young children.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1342676/posts


9 posted on 02/20/2005 12:13:41 PM PST by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DirtyHarryY2K

BTTT


11 posted on 02/20/2005 12:41:17 PM PST by 185JHP ( "The thing thou purposest shall come to pass: And over all thy ways the light shall shine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson