Pardon my thinking out loud, but is that really relevant? Wouldn't it be better to do something emphasizing that, in opposing prosecution of the present war, the "anti-war" protesters are abetting a brutal and illegal insurgency?
IOW by playing the Powell footage you'll be making it about the first war, the (as the left would have it) "illegal" and "preemptive" "invasion" of a "soveriegn" state, etc. The left's case is weak enough there, but it's weaker still wrt the present war, where the illegality and aggression is on the side of the insurgents, attacking a government -- the Iraqi Interim Government -- recognized as sovereign and legitimate by the U.N., the Arab league and hundreds of other nations.
Don't make it about what happened two years ago. Make it about the left supporting mass murders, suicide bombers and decapitators right now.
The most popular liberal argument is that "there were no WMD's" and that Bush lied. This is why I wanted to replay the Colin Powell address - especially the part:
``We just have a small question about this committee that is coming with Mohamed El Baradei.''
``We have this modified vehicle. What do we say if one of them sees it?''
``You didn't get a modified. You don't have one of those, do you?''
`I have one.''
``Which, from where?''
``From the workshop, from the Al Kendi (ph) Company?''
``What?''
``From Al Kendi (ph).''
`I'll come to see you in the morning. I'm worried. You all have something left.''
``We evacuated everything. We don't have anything left.''
Colin Powell's 2003 report completely refutes the arguments coming from the left today about the war.