Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thousands to be warned following no-contest plea in identity theft case
WorldLink.com ^ | February 19, 2005 | Alex Veiga

Posted on 02/19/2005 9:21:39 AM PST by holymoly

LOS ANGELES - A Nigerian man accused of stealing from data warehouser ChoicePoint Inc. information that could be used in identity theft pleaded no contest Thursday and was sentenced to 16 months in state prison.

The case against Olatunji Oluwatosin, 41, was part of a "much larger investigation" into allegations of fraudulent access to the data-gathering company's personal information database, the county district attorney's office said in a statement.

ChoicePoint acknowledged this week that thieves apparently used previously stolen identities to create bogus businesses and open 50 accounts with ChoicePoint. The thieves obtained volumes of data on consumers, including names, addresses, Social Security numbers and credit reports.

ChoicePoint said 145,000 people were being notified by the company that their personal information may have been stolen.

The ring, which operated for more than a year before it was detected, has defrauded at least 750 people, The Los Angeles Times reported, quoting a county sheriff's detective.

Oluwatosin was arrested in a police sting in October. He was found with five cell phones and three credit cards - all in other people's names, prosecutors said.

An district attorney's spokeswoman declined to provide more detail, citing an ongoing probe.

At a midmorning court hearing, Oluwatosin entered the plea to a single count of unlawful use of personal identification, court officials said. He had been charged with multiple counts ranging from making a false financial statement to possessing a fake driver's license.

Los Angeles Superior Court Commissioner Paul Enright gave Oluwatosin credit for 180 days served in custody.

Oluwatosin, of North Hollywood, did not admit to any wrongdoing and did not agree to help authorities with their investigation, said attorney Michael R. Enger.

"He's not cooperating in any way," Enger said.

Alpharetta, Ga.-based ChoicePoint initially only notified 35,000 people in California of the identity theft threat because the state has a law mandating the companies possession personal information must notify people if it is compromised.

The company said it decided to expand its warnings beyond California after learning that the fraud ring appeared to be a national operation.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: choicepoint; fraud; id; identity; identitytheft; number; socialsecurity; ss; theft
The thieves obtained volumes of data on consumers, including names, addresses, Social Security numbers and credit reports.

IMO A SS# number should be guarded jealously, and should not be given out with reckless abandon.
1 posted on 02/19/2005 9:21:41 AM PST by holymoly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: holymoly

Is the criminal be deported?


2 posted on 02/19/2005 9:32:48 AM PST by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

I totally agree about the Social Security numbers. Speaking from experience from Identity theft and having our bank account robbed, there are such major problems and so many holes with business' that hold our information. BJ's at one time was hacked and someone took off with hundreds of credit card numbers. I know it happens but it's so easy for the hackers right now.


3 posted on 02/19/2005 9:33:04 AM PST by GodBlessUSA (No, just because my user-name was on that thread-I'm not a troll. 4 years of posting and 1+lurking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
I'll see you and raise you. I am not aware of any significant precedent that address the nature of personal information gathered by third parties for the purpose of marketing or profiling.

I submit that the unique collection of data and facts associated with an individual's unique identity is proprietary and therefore subject to copyright and/or intellectual property protections.

Given this, then, there are royalties owed to individuals whose data has been collected and traded for profit by concerns whose primary source of revenue is that practice. Seems like a fine basis for a class action suit to give ID protection laws the teeth needed.

I'd like to meet a lawyer possessing the principles and balls to build the case.

4 posted on 02/19/2005 9:35:23 AM PST by the invisib1e hand ("remember, from ashes you came, to ashes you will return.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
Also, when they catch these guys, whether it be one or the gang - they ought to be charged and punished severely. I've been hoping to see this occur and it's not happening anywhere near the numbers the fraud is.
5 posted on 02/19/2005 9:37:24 AM PST by GodBlessUSA (No, just because my user-name was on that thread-I'm not a troll. 4 years of posting and 1+lurking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
"He's not cooperating in any way," Enger said"

WTF. 16 months in jail. What about restitution AND cooperation in return for such a light sentence. On the other hand, maybe he is cooperating and they are trying to give cover - Who knows.

6 posted on 02/19/2005 9:43:41 AM PST by drt1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodBlessUSA

This is the future. It's no safer than 150 years ago when you had to keep your money in your mattress because you couldn't trust the banks.... except this time it's not just the cash you have in one place that gets stolen, it's your whole economic life that gets ruined by the theft.

There should be heavy penalties for the thieves. I don't think there should be penalties for the credit companies except when they fail to immediately report the theft - you don't want to do anything that discourages them from publicly announcing the problem. If there's any incentive to hide it, they will.


7 posted on 02/19/2005 9:45:08 AM PST by lOKKI (You can ignore reality until it bites you in the ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lOKKI
"You don't want to do anything that discourages them [Credit Card Companies] from publicly announcing the problem. If there's any incentive to hide it, they will."

On the other hand, they (Financial Companies) need STRONGER incentives to keep this information secure. IMO It is their negligence that disrupts many financial lives and, at present, these companies appear to escape responsibility for their failings. Why should the burden of the consequences of their negligence fall completely on the shoulders of their innocent, already victimized, customers?

8 posted on 02/19/2005 9:51:01 AM PST by drt1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All
FYI

Federal Trade Commission:
ID Theft Home
Take Charge: Fighting Back Against Identity Theft
9 posted on 02/19/2005 9:53:03 AM PST by holymoly ("A lot" is TWO words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

Until the penalty fits the crime, this kind of identity theft will flourish. Sixteen months means he will actually only serve eight months minus credit for time served, so five months is a good guess. Figure how much money can be made by one of these capers divided by the actual time behind bars and this turns out to be a very well paying profession. Even copping a plea, this should have been grand theft and five years.


10 posted on 02/19/2005 10:17:19 AM PST by charleywhiskey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

There's no word as to his immigration status ... if illegal, he should be facing federal charges; if not illegal, then whatever document supports his being in the US should be revoked, and then he gets deported. A 16 month sentence is WAY TOO LIGHT.


11 posted on 02/19/2005 10:49:31 AM PST by NonValueAdded ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good" HRC 6/28/2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

There's no word as to his immigration status ... if illegal, he should be facing federal charges; if not illegal, then whatever document supports his being in the US should be revoked, and then he gets deported. A 16 month sentence is WAY TOO LIGHT.


12 posted on 02/19/2005 10:50:54 AM PST by NonValueAdded ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good" HRC 6/28/2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

I think that our penal system is years behind the times, and that identity theft, spamming, and computer malware need to be punished much more severely than they are currently.


13 posted on 02/19/2005 11:07:29 AM PST by white trash redneck (Everything I needed to know about Islam I learned on 9-11-01.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: white trash redneck
.."identity theft, spamming, and computer malware need to be punished much more severely than they are currently."

You got that right. Kick the potheads out of prison and throw the key away on white collar fraud artists. Put 'em in the general population and give 'em all lipstick!

14 posted on 02/19/2005 11:12:26 AM PST by paleocon patriarch ("Never attribute to a conspiracy that which can be explained by incompetence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lOKKI

The fundamental problem is that our system of verifying identity for the purpose of granting credit is based on the ability to provide personal information that only the person himself should know. However, the idea that only Person X should know certain personal information about Person X is a deeply flawed assumption. As far as I'm concerned, a Federal law should be passed that emphatically places all responsibility (including court costs and legal fees,) and the burden of proof, entirely on the backs of those who grant credit based on this flawed assumption.


15 posted on 02/19/2005 11:15:26 AM PST by sourcery (Resistance is futile: We are the Blog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson