[Dimensio]

Then you should have made YOUR intentions more clear to begin with.

The context surrounding the question within the very post (that you didn't bother to quote -- you just selectively quoted two lines from my post, which indicates dishonesty on your part), in addition to the caveat that it would not be applicable should the subject have a working knowledge of assembly code should have very obviously implied the intentions. If you really did not understand my intentions, and you really weren't trying to be distractingly dishonest, then it only means that you lack fundamental reading comprehension skills.

Which is it? Are you lacking in integrity, or just intelligence?

[Thatcherite]

Interesting, Elsie also has a history of selectively quoting portions of my posts and claiming (out of context) that they constitute a contradiction. When this is pointed out it ends up somehow being my fault.

I don't think that this is either a lack of intelligence or integrity on her part. I think it is Morton's Demon in full force. Material from the "e" side of the debate is desperately scrutinized for apparent (but actually non-existent) contradictions by the Demon and the thinking parts of Elsie's brain never get a look-in to examine the real argument.

If Elsie scrutinised the Bible for apparent contradictions with the same enthusiasm that she scrutinizes our postings she'd never make it past Genesis I.

[Elsie]

Only TWO from which to choose??


(Maybe it's one of which you haven't thought.)


[Thanks, Thatch!]